Welcome Guest

Correct. That's why I used both convicted AND found liable

Posted on: April 7, 2021 at 14:11:00 CT

SparkyStalcup MU

Posts:

24196

Member For:

13.14 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

to describe the different consequences between criminal and civil trials.

Now answer the question, you rube.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

""please judge, lying should be legally protected" - JG A - 4/7 12:29:21

Please, gubmint......don’t allow people to freely speak! - MIZ45 MU - 4/7 14:38:06

RE: ""please judge, lying should be legally protected" - MOCO SON MU - 4/7 14:34:38

another retard mullet moment. his argument is based on - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/7 14:00:07

LOl - JG A - 4/7 14:46:32

For libs it’s protected under oath before senate committees. - hokie VT - 4/7 13:09:48

yes, that’s called freedom of speech (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/7 12:58:09

Wrong - mu4ever DUKE - 4/7 15:33:31

Free speech does not mean free of consequences. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/7 13:29:58

You're an idiot, freedom of speech protections can apply - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/7 14:03:11

Has anyone ever been convicted or found liable due - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/7 14:05:38

you jumped in with your stupidity as usual - pickle MU

- 4/7 14:12:29

And you again are not very self-aware. You have no cause - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/7 14:15:59

uh no people aren't "convicted" in civil suits dumb ass - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/7 14:08:21

Correct. That's why I used both convicted AND found liable - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/7 14:11:00

Your question made no sense idiot(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/7 14:16:04

I know it went over your head, so I will rephrase: - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/7 14:18:36

lol amazing, your re-phrasin it made it even sillier and - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/7 14:24:26

you’re being stupid - pickle MU

- 4/7 14:21:13

No, it isn't irrelevant. It directly contradicts your - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/7 14:26:20

Ok, smart guy - pickle MU

- 4/7 14:38:13

lol you truly are an idiot(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/7 14:28:09

all these years i gave him the benefit of the doubt - pickle MU

- 4/7 14:39:56

why are you stupid? (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/7 13:33:00

Look in the mirror. You're aren't very self-aware. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/7 13:36:06

For you that is even dumb - mu7176grad MU - 4/7 13:15:59

well you’re the “lawyer” who thinks the 1st Amendment - pickle MU

- 4/7 13:23:06

Lying is constitutionally protected. - dangertim MU

- 4/7 12:45:29

Freedom of speech only protects you from the government - Say_What MU - 4/7 12:55:04

freedom of speech protections can apply in defamation suits(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/7 14:03:54

Usually slander and libel aren't protected speech. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/7 14:06:51

lol slander and libel are both conclusory terms - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/7 14:13:26

again, it’s freedom of speech - pickle MU

- 4/7 14:13:26

The truth is just fine. - RHAYWORTH MU - 4/7 14:10:09

no (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/7 13:28:45

That's his point (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/7 13:05:49

The gubmint isn't suing rudy - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 4/7 13:25:14

irrelevant. it’s a defamation lawsuit (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/7 13:35:17

lol (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/7 12:45:55

BAM!(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/7 12:45:52