No
Posted on: April 5, 2021 at 09:33:33 CT
o'lineydisciple MU
Posts:
6917
Member For:
26.27 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
1. It pushes the "I'll trade freedom for a vaccine" towards coercion regarding medical informed consent. (Personal note: I've already received the vaccine but think it's important for people to make their own decisions regarding this). People should not be treated differently based on a personal medical decision.
2. I have very serious skepticism regarding how my personal health information would be safeguarded.
3. I have serious skepticism that "vaccine passports" may morph into something even more invasive into personal privacy and personal choice. If government can prevent people from participating in some parts of society based on medical decision, then government very well could prevent people from participating in parts of society based on other issues. When has anything government's been involved in not been susceptible to project scope creep?