 |
|
Suppose this: Suppose that the supreme ruler decided to
Posted on: March 28, 2021 at 07:39:37 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68186
Member For:
9.67 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
destroy, kill, eliminate or end the existence of all people on earth who committed acts of physical violence; murder, rape, battery, armed robbery....against another person solely because of that person’s race.
Which race on this planet would lose the most people if this were done? That is, which race has the most violent racists?
This is a hypothetical question. Liberals need not read any further, this upsets you. It forces you to think and evaluate your own principles. Understandably, that makes you uncomfortable.
As for definitions, the supreme ruler can be god or whatever being or entity you wish to assign to that role. It is not a human but rather a flawless being who never makes mistakes. It is not JG but I can understand the confusion around that.
Acts of violence do not include micro aggressions whether intentional or accidental. They do not include the liberal BS mantra of, “silence is violence“. Only acts of physical battery by one person against others are considered.
Calling someone a poopy head is not an act of violence. Printing and distributing leaflets condemning Black Lives Matter or the KKK is not violence.
Calling someone an N, or a cracker, or a spic, chink, gook or diaper head or using those terms publicly or privately is not violence for the purpose of this hypothetical question.
Only up close and personal physical attacks are violent for the purpose of this hypothetical question.
The bottom line question is, which race commits the most racial acts of violence?
Edited by hokie at 08:00:36 on 03/28/21
Which race on this planet would lose the most people if this were done? That is, which race has the most violent racists?
This is a hypothetical question. Liberals need not read any further, this upsets you. It forces you to think and evaluate your own principles. Understandably, that makes you uncomfortable.
As for definitions, the supreme ruler can be god or whatever being or entity you wish to assign to that role. It is not a human but rather a flawless being who never makes mistakes. It is not JG but I can understand the confusion around that.
Acts of violence do not include micro aggressions whether intentional or accidental. They do not include the liberal BS mantra of, “silence is violence“. Only acts of physical battery by one person against others are considered.
Calling someone a poopy head is not an act of violence. Printing and distributing leaflets condemning Black Lives Matter or the KKK is not violence.
Calling someone an N, or a cracker, or a spic, chink, gook or diaper head or using those terms publicly or privately is not violence for the purpose of this hypothetical question.
Only up close and personal physical attacks are violent for the purpose of this hypothetical question.
The bottom line question is, which race commits the most racial acts of violence?
Edited by hokie at 08:00:36 on 03/28/21
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Suppose this: Suppose that the supreme ruler decided to - hokie VT - 3/28 07:39:37