 |
|
the cause of death was NOT asphyxiation. you need
Posted on: March 22, 2021 at 01:11:38 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14357
Member For:
19.88 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
to re-read (if you ever bothered in the first place) the ME's report.
the plaintiff's attorney's paid for an autopsy after the fact and that was ONE finding. what's not discussed is they don't re-examine the body they simply read the ME's report and then come up with their own conclusions.
should someone be found guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, when there are conflicting medical reports?
Edited by blake1771 at 01:20:24 on 03/22/21
the plaintiff's attorney's paid for an autopsy after the fact and that was ONE finding. what's not discussed is they don't re-examine the body they simply read the ME's report and then come up with their own conclusions.
should someone be found guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, when there are conflicting medical reports?
Edited by blake1771 at 01:20:24 on 03/22/21
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
the cause of death was NOT asphyxiation. you need - blake1771 MU - 3/22 01:11:38