 |
|
so there is no PRO Act? It didn't pass the house?
Posted on: March 12, 2021 at 06:41:55 CT
tigerinhogtown STL
Posts:
64033
Member For:
24.39 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
We have 40 contractor doing PT/OT/ST. And they want it that way, It doesn't save us any money, it put more money in THEIR pockets and - here's the kicker - LESS in gov't's pocket.
They do this and likely 25 of them become employees, 15 out the door to find work elsewhere.
(b) Employee.—Section 2(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following:“An individual performing any service shall be considered an employee (except as provided in the previous sentence) and not an independent contractor, unless—
(A) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under the contract for the performance of service and in fact;
Edited by tigerinhogtown at 06:57:09 on 03/12/21
They do this and likely 25 of them become employees, 15 out the door to find work elsewhere.
(b) Employee.—Section 2(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following:“An individual performing any service shall be considered an employee (except as provided in the previous sentence) and not an independent contractor, unless—
(A) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under the contract for the performance of service and in fact;
Edited by tigerinhogtown at 06:57:09 on 03/12/21
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
so there is no PRO Act? It didn't pass the house? - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/12 06:41:55