Welcome Guest

In order to present "evidence" you have to have a claim..

Posted on: March 8, 2021 at 10:25:18 CT
Gyro MU
Posts:
52294
Member For:
23.09 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
that is slightly plausible, in a legal sense. So if Trump's cases were thrown out, what does that say about their plausibility? I can't fathom all of these courts conspiring to not hear a legitimate legal dispute involving a national election unless there was zero or next to zero legitimate evidence of it.

Besides, how does someone argue that the votes for Biden on a ballot are illegitimate but the votes for a Republican senator on the same ballot are valid? No one can.

The simple truth is that our antiquated village by village level voting system guards well against fraud.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     RE: SC denies post-election suit by Trump against WI - MOCO SON MU - 3/8 10:19:16
          In order to present "evidence" you have to have a claim.. - Gyro MU - 3/8 10:25:18
               RE: In order to present "evidence" you have to have a claim.. - MOCO SON MU - 3/8 10:34:02
                    You're certainly not alone in your confusion... - Gyro MU - 3/8 10:53:32
     RE: SC denies post-election suit by Trump against WI - Gyro MU - 3/8 09:05:18
          Let us know when any court allows evidence discovery and - BH O'bonga MU - 3/8 09:14:31
               Let us know when actual evidence of anything... - Gyro MU - 3/8 10:16:41
               LOL - Ace AU - 3/8 09:28:01




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard