Welcome Guest

The article lost credibility when “Chiefs set at Tackle”

Posted on: February 22, 2021 at 17:08:57 CT
MoGold MU
Posts:
8909
Member For:
19.94 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Was what it said for KC. They lost them both....one won’t be ready until at the earliest next Christmas and the other with a back injury that had him miss 2/3 of season and all post season. These are the two worst injuries OL can have and both their careers are in jeopardy. No more uninformed comment could be made saying “the Chiefs are set at tackle”. I don’t know, maybe they didn’t watch the Super Bowl
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

PFF 2 round Mock - Dawg UGA - 2/22 15:11:33
     Why on earth would atl make that fake trade? - MIZtigerZOU MU - 2/22 19:54:49
          RE: Why on earth would atl make that fake trade? - meansonny UGA - 2/24 06:37:09
     As a Chiefs fan - Diamond Dave MU - 2/22 17:37:29
          Would Denver have the sack to bench Watson when Lock - TigerMatt - 2/22 18:34:21
     The article lost credibility when “Chiefs set at Tackle” - MoGold MU - 2/22 17:08:57
          Veach will get a FA or two, unless Niang is ready to go(nm) - Diamond Dave MU - 2/22 17:42:07
     That wouldn't make Denver SB contenders - Tptiger MU - 2/22 17:00:17
          Agreed, the Tom Brady reference was stupid - MoGold MU - 2/22 17:12:56
     Fields at #3? Lol... bust.(nm) - TigerMatt - 2/22 16:38:18




©2021 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard