 |
|
RE: 'no evidence to suggest any fraud great enough to overtu
Posted on: January 13, 2021 at 13:54:28 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72867
Member For:
21.62 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
rn the election'
I disagree.
There was an interesting clip of one of Trump's lawyers (not Lin Wood nor Sydney Powell) presenting his evidence to the Nevada state legislature at a hearing, I believe. It was rock solid evidence, but the court tossed it out because they could not submit it within the 3 days the court alloted them.
The problem with that was that the state, controlled in that regard by a Democrat, drug their feet on giving them the documents they had subpoened until it was too late.
The documents showed that more people had voted than were registered to vote in some jurisdictions. He listed both the number of registered voters, then the number who voted and finally the number in excess.
Then he gave the number of people who were dead who had been listed as having voted. They cross referenced the deaths recorded by the state with the list of voters who had voted.
He gave the number of voters who had voted more than once. Again this was meticulously documented from the voter rolls using the names, dates of birth and address where they were registered.
They added up all of those numbers and they far exceeded the difference in the voting totals between Biden and Trump.
That is just one instance of they types of hurdles they were facing.
That, among other things, was documented on the video from this page (unfortunately, Youtube has deleted the video):
The truth about the 2020 election is far more sinister than you think
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/the-truth-about-the-2020-election-is-far-more-sinister-than-you-think
Edited by JeffB at 13:56:07 on 01/13/21
I disagree.
There was an interesting clip of one of Trump's lawyers (not Lin Wood nor Sydney Powell) presenting his evidence to the Nevada state legislature at a hearing, I believe. It was rock solid evidence, but the court tossed it out because they could not submit it within the 3 days the court alloted them.
The problem with that was that the state, controlled in that regard by a Democrat, drug their feet on giving them the documents they had subpoened until it was too late.
The documents showed that more people had voted than were registered to vote in some jurisdictions. He listed both the number of registered voters, then the number who voted and finally the number in excess.
Then he gave the number of people who were dead who had been listed as having voted. They cross referenced the deaths recorded by the state with the list of voters who had voted.
He gave the number of voters who had voted more than once. Again this was meticulously documented from the voter rolls using the names, dates of birth and address where they were registered.
They added up all of those numbers and they far exceeded the difference in the voting totals between Biden and Trump.
That is just one instance of they types of hurdles they were facing.
That, among other things, was documented on the video from this page (unfortunately, Youtube has deleted the video):
The truth about the 2020 election is far more sinister than you think
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/the-truth-about-the-2020-election-is-far-more-sinister-than-you-think
Edited by JeffB at 13:56:07 on 01/13/21
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
RE: 'no evidence to suggest any fraud great enough to overtu - JeffB MU - 1/13 13:54:28