RE: the point is obvious
Posted on: January 1, 2021 at 13:35:06 CT
MUTGR MU
Posts:
68836
Member For:
24.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
I linked a tweet from Jordan Shactel that I happened to agree with that says we are being played by our own government on the danger of covid. He posited that China has basically ignored it and they are doing fine. One of the examples of this is a video widely reported to be of people in Wuhan celebrating NYE in a huge crowd, which we in the US are not allowed to do due to covid.
When you say I am now hypocritically saying China can be believed, which of this information came from China? The video? Are you suggesting the video was disinformation from China? That I should assume it is disinformation from China? I believe the mainstream media routinely lies to us, but I also saw several media sites tweeting out that same video purportedly from Wuhan. Must I then assume it is all disinformation? Are you saying I should not believe Jordan Shactel's summary of China's reaction to covid because it is disinformation from China? I have no information to suggest he is incorrect, do you?
You seem to struggle with any nuance and current events. Yes, I believe there is ample evidence that corrupt elements within the FBI and DOJ concocted the false Russia Trump hoax in an attempt to undermine his Presidency. I believe there are many other examples of where the FBI has lied, or covered up crimes (Hillary's emails, etc.).
With that knowledge or belief in mind, in your world, I must reject everything action or statement or position of the FBI and DOJ? Is that how your mind words?
If I know person A has lied to me, must I believe everything person A says is a lie?
What if after lying to me, person A says the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. Must I believe that statement is a lie?
What a strange fellow you are. I've heard people on the spectrum are very rigid in their thinking. Everything is very black and white. Does this explain you?
How do you accept Jeffrey Tucker's beliefs and theories on economics, when he apparently is a Catholic traditionalist, that you reject?
If he can be wrong about religion, how can he be right about economics?
Edited by MUTGR at 13:37:41 on 01/01/21