Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Right. But you said If it were, then "it's", i.e., "it IS"

Posted on: December 17, 2020 at 09:45:55 CT
*M* KC
Posts:
31696
Member For:
24.13 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Hypothetical premise, definite conclusion. Poor rhetoric.

Take the L and move on.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

did something right to save 100,000 lives - tigerinhogtown STL - 12/17 09:09:18
     Current ~ 315K dead. There's two weeks until the end of the - SparkyStalcup MU - 12/17 09:31:57
          Liar - Panthera MU - 12/17 12:11:14
          lol....have you ever asked yourself why the Total Death #s - Mizzou Lou KC - 12/17 09:42:34
               oh lord, you're going to trigger paleojas (nm) - Sal MU - 12/17 09:43:59
                    uh oh...I'm unfamiliar with his work (nm) - Mizzou Lou KC - 12/17 10:10:48
          the forcast was over 400,000 - tigerinhogtown STL - 12/17 09:40:09
          It is not undercounted (nm) - Sal MU - 12/17 09:34:41
     "majority of people are taking precautions" - Sal MU - 12/17 09:12:13
          50.1% is a majority, but it's not enough. - *M* KC - 12/17 09:27:29
               If that were the number, then it's further proof that govt - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:31:26
                    As you know, it's not the number. It's the number I used - *M* KC - 12/17 09:34:11
                         "If that were" - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:35:12
                              "Then it's further proof" that "mandates don't work" - *M* KC - 12/17 09:38:17
                                   lol good lord this is an ignorant post (nm) - Sal MU - 12/17 09:41:34
                                        I'm sure that to you it seems that way Sal. Too many - *M* KC - 12/17 09:42:26
                                   It's an if/then hypothetical, counselor. (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:39:40
                                        So "if that were the number", then "it would be proof" - *M* KC - 12/17 09:41:55
                                             If...then. - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:44:09
                                                  Right. But you said If it were, then "it's", i.e., "it IS" - *M* KC - 12/17 09:45:55
                                                       From a K-12 website: - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:47:44
                                                            That would be useful if it represented what you said - *M* KC - 12/17 09:50:44
                                                                 That doesn't make any difference. They are both - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:51:23
                                                                      true, but one is an accurate conclusion, and the other is a - *M* KC - 12/17 09:52:26
                                                                           You originally took issue with me drawing a conclusion at - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:53:52
                                                       You are not making any sense (nm) - Sal MU - 12/17 09:47:23
                                                            Honestly, Sal, I don't expect you to understand it. - *M* KC - 12/17 09:48:14
                                             It was clearly a hypothetical statement (nm) - Sal MU - 12/17 09:43:15
                                                  I know that. But the conclusion was definite. - *M* KC - 12/17 09:44:21
                                                       lol wtf (nm) - Sal MU - 12/17 09:45:35
                                                       Yeah, that's the "then" part about an if/then statement. - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:44:49
                                                            Do you know the diffference between "then it is" and - *M* KC - 12/17 09:47:18
                                                                 Both would work for the conclusion that I was drawing - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:48:33
                                                                      One is accurate, the other is misleading. So for those - *M* KC - 12/17 09:51:35
                                                                           Regardless, they are both definite conclusions drawn from - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:53:03
                                                                                One is arguably true on its face, and one is demonstrably - *M* KC - 12/17 09:54:59
                                                                                     So you can challenge my conclusion drawn from - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:56:00
                                                                                          No, my initial beef in this thread was that - *M* KC - 12/17 09:59:29
                                                                                               Oh, you mean when you noted that the 50.1% number - ummmm MU - 12/17 10:03:22
                                                                                                    lol (nm) - Sal MU - 12/17 10:08:37
                                                                 take a breather (nm) - Sal MU - 12/17 09:48:08
                    That number would likely need to be closer to 75-80% to - SparkyStalcup MU - 12/17 09:33:26
                         I don't know what the number is but ultimately you're - ummmm MU - 12/17 09:36:43
                              Some people can't stand free thinking individuals - Sal MU - 12/17 09:42:42
                              You touched on the real issue for so many these days - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 12/17 09:41:08




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard