Welcome Guest

it isn't that their procedures are unconstitutional...

Posted on: December 15, 2020 at 13:48:04 CT

escalade MU

Posts:

16909

Member For:

24.32 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

it was that they unconstitutionally implemented them. SCOTUS should have took it up regardless of how they ruled. The primary function of the supreme court is to take up grievances between states. If they don't/won't do that there is no point in having a supreme court. I'm sure you'll disagree but that is my view of it.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Conservatism won at SCOTUS last Friday night - *M* KC - 12/15 13:37:58

RE: Conservatism won at SCOTUS last Friday night - MOCO SON MU - 12/15 14:06:09

No other state should be able to tell a state how their - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 12/15 14:23:08

they weren't willfully broken - ashtray UF - 12/15 14:40:27

they can't, because they don't have standing - ashtray UF - 12/15 14:11:09

but muh fat Donnie - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 12/15 13:52:53

These cons are - mizzoumurfkc KC - 12/15 13:51:57

RE: These cons are - tcat KC - 12/15 13:54:51

K - mizzoumurfkc KC - 12/15 13:59:10

it isn't that their procedures are unconstitutional... - escalade MU - 12/15 13:48:04

WE did - JG A - 12/15 13:46:30

Perhaps Missouri should sue California for not taking - TigerMatt STL - 12/15 13:44:25

The issue is not states setting their election laws - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 12/15 13:45:32

But you favor Executive Orders and Police judgment - meatiger MU - 12/15 14:16:29

There is no path, expressly stated or precedent - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 12/15 14:21:54

There used to be no path for a President to make a law - meatiger MU - 12/15 14:23:27

No true Scotsmen should be against the point I porject they - tcat KC - 12/15 13:42:05

Don't argue with them. - markymarksthirdnipple STL - 12/15 13:41:26

Stop talking about yourself(nm) - tcat KC - 12/15 13:42:52