 |
|
Why do you insist on drawing conclusions when claims haven't
Posted on: December 8, 2020 at 09:40:20 CT
MizzouTigerz MU
Posts:
37095
Member For:
21.95 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
been proven one way or the other?
And why do you act like an update posted after I asked my question, is something upon which I should have relied upon before posting my question, when
1. It wasn't there when I asked, check the timeline,
2. It says nothing about the DOJ,
3. It doesn't provide proof, just unsubstantiated claims by a partisan,
4. I don't do Q, and you are an idiot for suggesting I am a Q follower and/or promoter. As I explained several times before, only on rare occasions have I even looked at Q postings, and only to understand what someone was talking about from one. Being very generous, I might have looked at one as many as 10-15 times, maybe 20, but I seriously doubt it. Mostly I ignore Q references from both sides.
And why do you act like an update posted after I asked my question, is something upon which I should have relied upon before posting my question, when
1. It wasn't there when I asked, check the timeline,
2. It says nothing about the DOJ,
3. It doesn't provide proof, just unsubstantiated claims by a partisan,
4. I don't do Q, and you are an idiot for suggesting I am a Q follower and/or promoter. As I explained several times before, only on rare occasions have I even looked at Q postings, and only to understand what someone was talking about from one. Being very generous, I might have looked at one as many as 10-15 times, maybe 20, but I seriously doubt it. Mostly I ignore Q references from both sides.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Why do you insist on drawing conclusions when claims haven't - MizzouTigerz MU - 12/8 09:40:20