Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Vaccinating the front line and vulnurable for the simple

Posted on: December 4, 2020 at 10:27:52 CT
bactgr MU
Posts:
49693
Member For:
20.24 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
fact that it is a mere fraction of the total population is vastly more efficient.

I get what you are saying, but vaccinating 40 million is a hell of a lot faster and can be done more efficiently than vaccinating 112 million.

If the goal is to prevent death.

If the goal is to prevent the spread, you vaccinate the % of population spreading it the quickest.... but 65 and older are still spreading it too... and they are the % of the population dying from it.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I'll probably be mocked for this but I think that the 18-35 - hefeweizen MU - 12/4 08:57:54
     I would do those who "must work" and are exposed - meatiger MU - 12/4 09:14:54
     not a bad strategy - Sal MU - 12/4 09:00:41
          I agree with that. I am not being careful for me, - bactgr MU - 12/4 09:07:57
               Disagree. If you are vaxed first you can't give it to old - hefeweizen MU - 12/4 09:52:21
                    If the goal is to prevent people from dying, you give it to - bactgr MU - 12/4 10:05:14
                         Again, disagree. You give it the ones most likely to carry i - hefeweizen MU - 12/4 10:15:50
                              Vaccinating the front line and vulnurable for the simple - bactgr MU - 12/4 10:27:52
     By that logic, we should have no vax and let olds die - zoomer 99 - 12/4 09:00:14
          I never said they shouldn't get the vax. I said they - hefeweizen MU - 12/4 09:01:59
               I mean in terms of long-term stability - zoomer 99 - 12/4 09:03:29
                    not if you're a nursing home employee or investor (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 09:05:01




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard