Welcome Guest

Florida, because it was close, and the Florida Supreme Court

Posted on: November 17, 2020 at 21:56:47 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
69636
Member For:
20.86 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
called for a recount because they felt it was possible more of the Gore voters were confused by the system than Bush voters and they wanted to discern the "intent" of the voters over things like hanging chads and "dimpled chads" where maybe they didn't push hard enough to pop the chads out such that the card could be read.

The US Supreme Court said that the Florida court had exceeded it's authority, usurping the authority of the Florida legislature in changing the election rules.

The situation in 2020 is indeed different. In this case election officials themselves violated the election laws as set up by the legislature. On the other hand the Pennsylvania Supreme Court exceeded its authority in changing the election rules and was warned by at least one Supreme Court justice not to do so, but they did it anyway... and there are numerous other irregularities and computer problems that had been known and warned about before the election.

There are far more reasons to invalidate the results and have a full audited recount in the 6 contested states.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     They are the kU football of legal teams (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 11/17 21:41:46
          Fighting words. (nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 11/18 07:47:45
     Bush didn't win until it got to the Supreme Court. (nm) - JeffB MU - 11/17 21:38:58
          Tell me what happened - Ace A - 11/17 21:40:17
               The Florida Supreme Court ruled that manual recounts - JeffB MU - 11/17 21:47:31
                    The irony being both sides desperately tried to cheat - JG A - 11/17 21:55:05
                    why was there a recount? Why Florida? - Ace A - 11/17 21:48:48
                         Florida, because it was close, and the Florida Supreme Court - JeffB MU - 11/17 21:56:47
                              For the (sealed indictments)th time - JG A - 11/17 21:59:53
                                   Then they shouldn't object to an audited recount just so - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:02:17
                                        correct recounts and audits won't change a thing - JG A - 11/17 22:07:12
                                             Georgia didn't do an audited recount. They didn't check the - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:14:00
                                                  they hand counted every vote - JG A - 11/17 22:22:59
                                                       They didn't validate the signatures and if I recall they - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:25:09
                                                            Then Trump can pay for another recount - JG A - 11/17 22:42:29
                              How close was the FL result? - Ace A - 11/17 21:58:04
                                   537 when stopped - JG A - 11/17 22:00:49
                                        WI, AZ, GA, MI, PA are all over 10K in favor of Biden - Ace A - 11/17 22:03:28
                                             All very low percentages, particularly given that a - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:12:28
                                             Pardon me for answering your question - JG A - 11/17 22:05:51
                                                  All good b/c he kept avoiding the lack of relevance - Ace A - 11/17 22:11:05
                                                       It is a red herring. Even if it was 1 vote in Florida would - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:23:30
                                                            In a republican county done by a republican - JG A - 11/17 22:43:38
                                                                 Done by a Republican? Do you have a link to that story? - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:49:48
                                                                      Its my understanding it was the same person - JG A - 11/17 23:07:43
                                                                           What was his/her mistake? (nm) - JeffB MU - 11/17 23:16:39
                                                                                doesn't say if it was the same person - JG A - 11/17 23:28:24
                                                            One and twenty five - Ace A - 11/17 22:25:22
                                                                 Half time scores don't determine the winners. The Supreme - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:26:25
                                                                      the Supreme Court do not decide elections - JG A - 11/17 22:47:58
                                                                           They can decide cases that can change who the winner is. (nm) - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:52:40
                                                                                Not this year - JG A - 11/17 23:08:50
                                   Very close. But that isn't the criteria. These 6 states are - JeffB MU - 11/17 21:59:57
                                        not in the realm of possibility - JG A - 11/17 22:01:18
                                             Why? If they're so far ahead and there was no foul play - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:05:14
                                                  I say recount and audit all of them - JG A - 11/17 22:08:10
                                                       Good deal. (nm) - JeffB MU - 11/17 22:39:22
                                                       $7.9M in WI - Ace A - 11/17 22:11:56
                                                            Whoa.....that's 13 months of Rudy fees(nm) - Mormad MU - 11/17 22:24:48




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard