 |
|
Cause people are too proud to do things the easy way
Posted on: November 14, 2020 at 04:35:04 CT
MizzouTigerz MU
Posts:
37095
Member For:
21.19 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=17206064
and
Dr. Rogers Recommends - Dr. Sherry Rogers From Dr. Rogers' March 2015 Total Wellness Newsletter
How Much Vitamin D Do You Need?
"The title of the article in the Journal of the American Medical Association was "Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Critically Ill Patients with vitamin D Deficiency" (Amrein K, V12, pp 520-30, Oct 16, 2014). For starters, as you folks learned in TW 2014, the evidence clearly shows that to diagnose a vitamin D3 level, the cut-off should not be 30 ng/dL (as in Lab Corp, Quest, etc). Instead, as the incontrovertible evidence shows, 60-80 is an optimal vitamin D cut-off if you want to prevent heart disease, cancer, infections, diabetes, osteoporosis, depression, etc…The (study) summary said that this "high dose" (extremely wrong- it equated to 3,000 IU D3 daily) did not cut down the death rate or the length of stay or the recurrence of problems. It made no difference. But this was incorrect. Because in the results section they clearly showed that folks with the most severe deficiencies (under 12 ng/dL) who were corrected with D3 had a monstrous 59% decrease in death rate in the hospital, compared with the placebo group which was not given vitamin D3."
and
Dr. Rogers Recommends - Dr. Sherry Rogers From Dr. Rogers' March 2015 Total Wellness Newsletter
How Much Vitamin D Do You Need?
"The title of the article in the Journal of the American Medical Association was "Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Critically Ill Patients with vitamin D Deficiency" (Amrein K, V12, pp 520-30, Oct 16, 2014). For starters, as you folks learned in TW 2014, the evidence clearly shows that to diagnose a vitamin D3 level, the cut-off should not be 30 ng/dL (as in Lab Corp, Quest, etc). Instead, as the incontrovertible evidence shows, 60-80 is an optimal vitamin D cut-off if you want to prevent heart disease, cancer, infections, diabetes, osteoporosis, depression, etc…The (study) summary said that this "high dose" (extremely wrong- it equated to 3,000 IU D3 daily) did not cut down the death rate or the length of stay or the recurrence of problems. It made no difference. But this was incorrect. Because in the results section they clearly showed that folks with the most severe deficiencies (under 12 ng/dL) who were corrected with D3 had a monstrous 59% decrease in death rate in the hospital, compared with the placebo group which was not given vitamin D3."
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Cause people are too proud to do things the easy way - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/14 04:35:04