 |
|
See, you can get specific when you want to. And isn't that
Posted on: November 10, 2020 at 09:58:08 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68138
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
better than acting like The Idiot and offering only a four word quotation from the post to which you are responding?
See, this is how grown ups discuss things.
1. I don't trust your definition of "mass" or "evidence" (libs usually conflate evidence with proof) or of "fraud".
2. Dominion machine company, or something like that, experienced glitches where 600 trump votes were ooopsy, recorded as biden votes. They fixed it, of course. Dominion supplies the voting machines to 28, iirc, of the states and most of the largest precincts in those states.
If that happened with biden votes, would you be suspicious?
Why were there tens of thousands of ballots "found" that all had, every friggin one of them, a vote for biden? And none of them, not a siingle friggin one of them, had any down ballot votes at all?
If those votes were for trump, would you be suspicious?
Why did detroit, duh, polling place(s) tell everyone they would stop counting at 10:30 pm, and then when the R poll watchers left, they continued counting until 1am?
If that was in a R district, would you be suspicious?
There is according to you, "zero evidence of mass fraud". I suspect you define many of those terms differently than a nonpartisan educated person would.
There have been poll workers who swore to these allegations (i think that is correct) under penalty of perjury.
Should they be investigated, or do you need proof BEFORE you investigate a crime?
See, this is how grown ups discuss things.
1. I don't trust your definition of "mass" or "evidence" (libs usually conflate evidence with proof) or of "fraud".
2. Dominion machine company, or something like that, experienced glitches where 600 trump votes were ooopsy, recorded as biden votes. They fixed it, of course. Dominion supplies the voting machines to 28, iirc, of the states and most of the largest precincts in those states.
If that happened with biden votes, would you be suspicious?
Why were there tens of thousands of ballots "found" that all had, every friggin one of them, a vote for biden? And none of them, not a siingle friggin one of them, had any down ballot votes at all?
If those votes were for trump, would you be suspicious?
Why did detroit, duh, polling place(s) tell everyone they would stop counting at 10:30 pm, and then when the R poll watchers left, they continued counting until 1am?
If that was in a R district, would you be suspicious?
There is according to you, "zero evidence of mass fraud". I suspect you define many of those terms differently than a nonpartisan educated person would.
There have been poll workers who swore to these allegations (i think that is correct) under penalty of perjury.
Should they be investigated, or do you need proof BEFORE you investigate a crime?
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
See, you can get specific when you want to. And isn't that - hokie VT - 11/10 09:58:08