Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Is that not nearly 2:1?

Posted on: November 9, 2020 at 13:16:50 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
56694
Member For:
18.71 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Has something changed in the meaning of "nearly" or is this part of "new math"? Admittedly, I struggle with that.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Why Trump really lost. Hint; not anything you believe now - JG MU - 11/9 12:52:48
     Not oddly they don't think there was any fraud whatsoever in - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/9 13:13:24
          hahahahaha - JG MU - 11/9 13:16:41
     He lost because of the lack of a second round of stimulus. - jake_mu MU - 11/9 13:09:37
          No - JG MU - 11/9 13:11:58
               You guys talking about knuckles and stimulation - Mormad MU - 11/9 13:38:27
     What's amazing is how little he had to do to win... - Gyro MU - 11/9 12:56:16
          seems to me this realization - DesertTiger MU - 11/9 13:58:38
     RE: Why Trump really lost. Hint; not anything you believe now - MOCO SON MU - 11/9 12:56:06
     Lol no way am I reading that rambling nonsense - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/9 12:55:06
          The TLDR version - Mormad MU - 11/9 13:11:43
               RE: The TLDR version - JG MU - 11/9 13:12:53
                    Is that not nearly 2:1? - Mormad MU - 11/9 13:16:50
                         yes but we are talking about less than - JG MU - 11/9 13:25:16
          stay ignorant its who you are but I explain very clearly - JG MU - 11/9 12:56:18




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard