 |
|
Why are you misrepresenting (or repeating the gop lie)
Posted on: November 4, 2020 at 09:16:52 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58182
Member For:
24.36 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
regarding the PA ruling?
The PA ruling REQUIRES mailed ballots to contain a post-mark (the only issue regarding the post-mark is if in cases where it is illegible):
"In its Sept. 17 ruling, the divided state Supreme Court said ballots must be postmarked by the time polls close and be received by county election boards at 5 p.m. on Nov. 6, three days after the Nov. 3 election. It also said that ballots lacking a clear postmark could be counted unless there was evidence that they were mailed after the polls closed."
Simply put - PA established its voting regulations and you want the SC to re-write those rules.
I would agree that PA's rules aren't the best (IMO, they should begin tabulating mail-in ballots ahead of time, so that there's not a delay in reporting), but those are their rules.
Edited by tigerdb at 09:19:04 on 11/04/20
The PA ruling REQUIRES mailed ballots to contain a post-mark (the only issue regarding the post-mark is if in cases where it is illegible):
"In its Sept. 17 ruling, the divided state Supreme Court said ballots must be postmarked by the time polls close and be received by county election boards at 5 p.m. on Nov. 6, three days after the Nov. 3 election. It also said that ballots lacking a clear postmark could be counted unless there was evidence that they were mailed after the polls closed."
Simply put - PA established its voting regulations and you want the SC to re-write those rules.
I would agree that PA's rules aren't the best (IMO, they should begin tabulating mail-in ballots ahead of time, so that there's not a delay in reporting), but those are their rules.
Edited by tigerdb at 09:19:04 on 11/04/20
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Why are you misrepresenting (or repeating the gop lie) - tigerdb MU - 11/4 09:16:52
-