 |
|
Randomish: J'mon Moore was really good. But they needed
Posted on: November 1, 2020 at 17:27:14 CT
BigTime SEMO
Posts:
5170
Member For:
22.34 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
to figure him out in order to get his best. It was key to have some arc or air under the ball. He was on of the best receivers ever at MU when the pass was, say, over 15 yards with enough arc. He really shined at out-battling the DB for the ball.
Kam Scott was long strider fast, but not quick. So he needed to be moving and not reliant on quick cuts to get open. He also had good skills with the ball in the air. Even the Lock to Kam touchdown inside, medium "slant" at The Swamp was just perfect.
It's not just about "gettin' good players", magnify strengths/minimize weaknesses.
Kam Scott was long strider fast, but not quick. So he needed to be moving and not reliant on quick cuts to get open. He also had good skills with the ball in the air. Even the Lock to Kam touchdown inside, medium "slant" at The Swamp was just perfect.
It's not just about "gettin' good players", magnify strengths/minimize weaknesses.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Randomish: J'mon Moore was really good. But they needed - BigTime SEMO - 11/1 17:27:14