Welcome Guest

so a clear implied direct threat, the words represent

Posted on: October 1, 2020 at 16:14:30 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
151569
Member For:
22.59 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the very clear and potential threat represented by the presence of a gun in your scenario.

if you wanted to debate the words alone, why bring the gun to this scenario at all if it was "invisible"?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

          Nope.. merely that they had a gun. - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:41:40
               RE: Nope.. merely that they had a gun. - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:13:24
                    Nice try(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:20:13
                         why did you mention a gun in your scenario if you wanted - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:39:26
                              So not all speech is free speech? Got it!(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:53:24
                                   oh, poor spanky (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:33:13
                                   incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 10/1 17:08:23
                                        Let's try it again - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:13:26
     it isn’t - pickle MU - 10/1 15:15:45
     who said that?(nm) - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:14:37
          90Tigs - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:20:54
               So you are talking about pointing a gun at someone and - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:32:07
                    I did not say the gun was pointed at anyone.. merely that I - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:38:34
                         Where is said gun? - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:41:47
                              i clearly stated it was a direct threat in the explanation (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 15:44:17
                                   I know what you said - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:46:17
                                        What is unclear?(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:54:18
                                             why mention a gun? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:12:29
                                                  Why not mention that I have a gun? - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:14:34
                                                       go to bed, JG (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:44:27
                                                            Unable to address the scenario without saying the scenario - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:10:38
                                                                 you shared a scenario and then essentially removed - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:33:51
                                                                      When did I remove the gun from it?(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:43:04
                                                                           by first saying "I have a gun", which in this scenario can O - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:46:38
                                                                                I didn't say that I said 'I have a gun' - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:51:20
                                                                                     if you want to know if words are free speech, why did you - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 18:06:06
                                                                                          Asked and answered, counselor(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 18:07:03
                                                                                               asked and avoided. "why not" is not an answer, JG (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 18:25:53
                                                                                                    Read, pickle - Spanky KU - 10/1 18:34:51
                                             You have not said where the gun is and the positions - meatiger MU - 10/1 16:03:36
                                   So not free speech?(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:45:31
                              Not in my hand nor pointed at you... - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:44:03
                                   WTF does that mean - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:47:00
                                        not in my hand and not pointed at you... but on my - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:49:47
                                             so like a holster? - meatiger MU - 10/1 16:02:55
                                                  a holster.. a sling... not in my hand but on my person(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:12:42
                                                       so a clear implied direct threat, the words represent - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:14:30
                                                            I never said nor implied it was an invisible gun. - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:17:35
                    figures he didn’t read the post - pickle MU - 10/1 15:34:04
                         You are the one who failed to read. - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:41:13
                              why mention the gun at all if you were truly interested - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:12:06
                                   It shows that the speech is 100% threatening - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:23:54
                                        no, the speech without the threat of a gun is free - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:37:45
                                             So pickle must always assume there is no gun present unless - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:46:19
                                                  leave me out of it (nm) - pickle MU - 10/1 17:57:15
                                                  protect himself from what? what? you're circling - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:48:38
                                                       the threat of violence(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:58:26
                                                            what threat? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 18:04:39
                                                                 A spoken threat that he will be shot - Spanky KU - 10/1 18:06:10
                              i didn’t read your post nor intend to - pickle MU - 10/1 15:43:22
                                   yet you responded to the post... TWICE!!! - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:45:01
                                        incorrect - pickle MU - 10/1 15:46:57
                                             then you would be....wait for it.... - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:53:53
                                                  no, spanky, he's not the dummy in this thread. You're - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:13:05
                                                       Neither are mutually exclusive. Do you think it is smart - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:18:55
                                                            once. you count as well as you read and think - pickle MU - 10/1 17:06:58
                                                                 You responded twice - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:19:44
                                                                      i replied to two different posts once each - pickle MU - 10/1 17:56:14
                                                                           On the same scenario without reading either - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:57:55
                                                            is this you thinking you've conquered understanding rights? - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:40:20
                                                                 Nope.. It is me showing that not all speech is free speech(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:56:10
                                                                      no, you removed the gun from your scenario, spanky (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:34:30
                                                                      no (nm) - pickle MU - 10/1 17:07:33




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard