Welcome Guest

It is not protected under law

Posted on: September 15, 2020 at 14:57:36 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
144613
Member For:
20.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Point out where the identity is protected under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act of 1998.

ICWPA doesn't prohibit employment-related retaliation and it provides no mechanism, such as access to a court or administrative body, for challenging retaliation that may occur as a result of having made a disclosure.

In 2006 Thomas Gimble, Acting Inspector General, Department of Defense, stated before the House Committee on Government Reform that the ICWPA is a 'misnomer' and that more properly the Act protects the communication of classified information to Congress.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     This whistleblower did not request confidentiality whereas - Mo Texan MU - 9/15 14:36:26
          RE: This whistleblower did not request confidentiality whereas - BH O'bonga MU - 9/15 16:06:26
          It is not protected under law - Spanky KU - 9/15 14:57:36
               This is correct. The protections are about - Outsider MU - 9/15 15:03:31
          There was no "other" one, it was potato headed vindman(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 9/15 14:44:05
               Have no idea. Just explained the process(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 9/15 14:54:58
     It was only illegal then. Strange law(nm) - Outsider MU - 9/15 14:11:21
     Only for Americans. (nm) - jonesin - 9/15 14:08:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard