Welcome Guest

So if a judge decides a 23 year old having anal sex

Posted on: September 7, 2020 at 09:06:50 CT

Calca STL

Posts:

18565

Member For:

12.53 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

with a 14 year old does not warrant an automatic sex offender registration for the 23 year old, you think that's okay?

Cause if you don't, then why are you defending the CA law?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

10 year old age difference. In CA he'd be good to go. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 9/7 07:56:56

Another fine Democrat (nm) - coolbean MU - 9/7 08:49:14

you are incredibly stupid (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/7 08:40:39

NAMBLA founding member ^^^^ (nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 9/7 09:02:00

Pickle defends Dem pedophiles, news at 11 - coolbean MU - 9/7 08:50:01

no one is defending pedophiles - pickle MU

- 9/7 08:51:37

Well defend the new law then - Calca STL - 9/7 08:59:25

Seems like you're trying pretty hard - coolbean MU - 9/7 08:58:20

really? link to any post where i defend it (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/7 09:02:25

RE: really? link to any post where i defend it (nm) - Calca STL - 9/7 09:05:33

incredibly stupid: You routinely defend pedos whenever the - BH O'bonga MU - 9/7 08:48:21

you are also incredibly stupid - pickle MU

- 9/7 08:49:55

incredibly stupid: Clearly, I touched a nerve there. - BH O'bonga MU - 9/7 09:06:27

you didn’t - pickle MU

- 9/7 09:10:54

And you still fail to explain how this law is okay - Calca STL - 9/7 09:31:03

So explain yourself then, justify the California law - Calca STL - 9/7 08:54:37

Don't let the facts get in the way - MrTruman2U MU - 9/7 08:16:06

Wrong...keep up skippy - coolbean MU - 9/7 08:50:29

California law on statutory rape is unchanged. California - MrTruman2U MU - 9/7 09:08:43

what did he say that’s incorrect? (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/7 08:54:28

It's up to a judge to decide if a 23 y/o who has anal sex - Calca STL - 9/7 08:57:29

LOL....how any moral person could defend this - coolbean MU - 9/7 08:58:46

California just passed a law to leave it up to the judge's - tigertix MU - 9/7 08:37:56

Wrong. The law is about mandatory sex offender registry (nm) - pickle MU

- 9/7 08:41:13

The cornerstone is the judges discretion on what to charge - tigertix MU - 9/7 08:42:58

Yep - coolbean MU - 9/7 09:00:44

Nope. it’s eliminating mandatory registry in certain cases - pickle MU

- 9/7 09:03:13

So if a judge decides a 23 year old having anal sex - Calca STL - 9/7 09:06:50

Again, you’re wrong - pickle MU

- 9/7 08:43:36

Are you a convicted pedo? I'm seriously wondering. - coolbean MU - 9/7 09:01:08

Again you fail to explain - Calca STL - 9/7 08:56:03

Struck a nerve there with the facts again..nm - tigertix MU - 9/7 08:55:51

no. you don’t have the facts - pickle MU

- 9/7 09:01:07

So you think a 23 year old having a$$ sex with a 14 year old - Calca STL - 9/7 09:04:54

you're dumber than a fence post (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 9/7 10:34:38

Same proposal to you ****head - Calca STL - 9/7 13:30:15