Suppose YOU ALONE would decide the presidency. You have two
Posted on: July 21, 2020 at 09:31:10 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68148
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
choices and you must pick one. (So naturally this hypothetical which already frightens and intimidates libs and idiots will not apply to The Idiot and his lackey and others too sophisticated to vote at all).
Candidate one believes in and supports every political issue you believe in. Whatever you believe in, this person does as well. It's a 100% match across the board. And she is an excellent and expert manager and executive. She gets things done. She wins. She is by any measure, successful.
But she is scummy. She lies. She has in the past cheated people and and cheated on her spouse. She provided semi legal jobs to family and friends that enriched them unfairly. She is an ego maniac. She is all about her. Her success, her importance, her image and her notorious self promotion.
You would not like this person. She is unprincipled, deceitful and maybe even criminal. You cannot necessarily trust what she says.
Candidate two is just the nicest guy. He loves everyone and everyone loves him. People who disagree with him say that he is just the nicest guy. He is honest, hard working, principled and sincere in everything he says and does.
You can absolutely trust and believe what he says.
But he is against everything you believe in. The things you think are important he thinks are trivial. The things you want to change, he thinks are great as they are. The things you think are perfect as they are, he wants to change or eliminate totally.
Like candidate one, he is a great manager and executive. He gets things done. Honestly, openly and principally.
Vote for the nice guy?
Vote for the scoundrel?
Are you voting for a ceo, a general patton, or for a new BFF and someone with whom you can have a good cry?
......
It's a hypothetical and that scares libs because hypotheticals reveal hypocrisy.
Most of you won't answer. But some of you may think.