Welcome Guest

Not a good way to look at it. Liver Cancer has a 15%

Posted on: July 20, 2020 at 11:12:29 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146272
Member For:
20.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
survival rate over a 5 year period. If you look at the entire global population (including those who never got liver cancer, then the survival rate is 99.9999999999%

You HAVE to look at the rate of those who die after they contract the disease.... not the rate of those who die including those who never contracted it at all.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     PSA from TX DSHS-link - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 10:50:23
          looks like a gvmt sham and now they are covering - 90Tiger STL - 7/20 11:14:09
          But are the numbers in the chart wrong? nm. - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:07:35
               No (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:09:10
                    They calculated the mortality rate wrong. - dangertim MU - 7/20 11:33:12
                    It's misleading because it interferes with their so far - MUTGR MU - 7/20 11:11:03
          But they don't discount the numbers? - Sal MU - 7/20 10:52:52
               notice how they said “flu” and “covid associated” - pickle MU - 7/20 10:56:22
               Damn, what a sheep you are(nm) - miz_zou MU - 7/20 10:55:17
                    huh? (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 10:55:26
                         It's a fake and you try to defend it.(nm) - miz_zou MU - 7/20 10:57:28
                              it didn't say it was fake - Sal MU - 7/20 10:58:47
                                   Did you miss this part below - miz_zou MU - 7/20 11:02:01
                                        Where did they dispute the numbers? (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:03:17
                                             Damn, you're dumb-believe what you think(nm) - miz_zou MU - 7/20 11:07:13
                                                  Wrong, he's told what to believe - playhard NWMSU - 7/20 11:10:00
                                                       lol holy irony (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:12:05
                                                            The irony is that you actually think that you think for - playhard NWMSU - 7/20 11:17:12
                                                                 I'm the one who went out and did my own research - Sal MU - 7/20 11:18:20
                                                                      So you did the actual research? Did you call everyone - playhard NWMSU - 7/20 11:37:18
                                                                           Huh? (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:38:09
                                                                                You said you did your own research - playhard NWMSU - 7/20 11:45:39
                                                                                     I never said I conducted my own research (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:46:29
                                                                                          So now you're saying you didn't do your own research - playhard NWMSU - 7/20 11:48:33
                                                                                               lol you have trouble reading - Sal MU - 7/20 11:53:07
                                                                      You posted a link-where exactly are those numbers? And why - miz_zou MU - 7/20 11:23:51
                                                                           RE: You posted a link-where exactly are those numbers? And why - Sal MU - 7/20 11:25:32
                                                                                Numbers where are they in that? Now slowly on the logo - miz_zou MU - 7/20 11:37:31
                                                                                     Can you not read for yourself? (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:38:37
                                                  Are you saying the numbers aren't accurate? (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:08:47
                                                       Why should I beleive a fake chart?(nm) - miz_zou MU - 7/20 11:10:31
                                                            lol, boy oh boy, lol @ you (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/20 11:14:56
                                                            they said the comparison is misleading - pickle MU - 7/20 11:11:28
                                                            The numbers are accurate (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:11:00
               SMH(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 10:54:33
                    The PSA said nothing about the numbers being incorrect (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 10:54:56
                         The point is that it's fake!(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 10:56:02
                              it does not say that(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/20 10:57:28
                                   "DSHS did not create nor approve this chart. "(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 10:59:51
                                        The comparisons are misleading - meatiger MU - 7/20 11:09:33
                                        they didn’t say the numbers are wrong (nm) - pickle MU - 7/20 11:01:02
                                        They didn't dispute the numbers though (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:00:18
                                             So everytime someone makes up **** they should dispute it - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 11:05:30
                                                  what was made up? - pickle MU - 7/20 11:07:43
                                                  Nobody made anything up - Sal MU - 7/20 11:07:09
                                                       The chart in question is not shown there(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 11:08:48
                                                            lol what? (nm) - pickle MU - 7/20 11:10:21
                                                                 You saw a chart on that link?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 11:15:15
                                                                      The chart in question is in the OP (nm) - pickle MU - 7/20 11:27:21
                                                                           And that did not come from the state or on his link(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 11:40:14
                                                                                the numbers are from the state (nm) - pickle MU - 7/20 11:51:18
                                                                      So you aren't disputing the numbers? (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:16:01
                                                                           Have no idea, if DSHS says they're misleading and it's not - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 11:19:46
                                                                                They only said the comparison is misleading - Sal MU - 7/20 11:20:11
                                                                                     And you totally discount that it's a faked chart. You just - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 11:30:48
                                                                                          The numbers are accurate (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:31:53
                                                            holy sh*t (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 11:08:58
     So in the last two years, 1 out of 3 people who test - playhard NWMSU - 7/20 10:47:32
          No, see link above(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 7/20 10:52:26
               They didn't say the numbers are incorrect (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 10:53:35
          When is the last time you had a flu test? - Sal MU - 7/20 10:49:09
               That doesn't answer my question, does the chart - playhard NWMSU - 7/20 10:50:56
                    likely only test when they die (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/20 11:16:58
                    or maybe they only test when they are dead(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/20 10:52:26
                    Yes it does - Sal MU - 7/20 10:52:14
     lol. that recovery % stat is pretty stupid. - gmmm98 MU - 7/20 10:39:04
          yeah..the flus ones should be like 93%(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/20 10:44:21
          Actually, it's a pretty important statistic for those that - ummmm MU - 7/20 10:43:33
               calling it "recovery" is disingenuous - gmmm98 MU - 7/20 10:45:29
                    I see what you are saying. They should call it "survival - ummmm MU - 7/20 10:48:36
          RE: lol. that recovery % stat is pretty stupid. - MOCO SON MU - 7/20 10:42:30
          how is that data manipulation? (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 10:41:57
          Those what don't die..recovered. Correct?(nm) - Spanky KU - 7/20 10:40:57
               it's not those that recovered - gmmm98 MU - 7/20 10:43:06
                    Not a good way to look at it. Liver Cancer has a 15% - Spanky KU - 7/20 11:12:29
                         that is my point - gmmm98 MU - 7/20 11:26:23
                              I suppose... but I think your point is off base - Spanky KU - 7/20 11:33:00
                                   i think you're just too stupid to understand it.(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 7/20 16:46:59
                    RE: it's not those that recovered - MOCO SON MU - 7/20 10:48:06
     damn (nm) - Sal MU - 7/20 10:28:31




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard