 |
|
Let's see your preferences for across the board scheduling
Posted on: July 11, 2020 at 20:11:00 CT
Fool on the Hill MU
Posts:
10571
Member For:
20.83 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
rules.
Mine: Nine conference games, three non-con. Two of the three must be P5, and the third must at least be D1. No more FCS opponents.
My rationale as an MU fan: If this program ever gets to the place where we want to see it, then MU will be looked at as a feared opponent instead of us saying we shouldn't schedule Wisconsin or whomever. I'd rather see a competitive loss to a team like that than MU wiping the field with Delaware St. or SEMO. Also, It would draw more fans to the stadium, be better TV viewing, and make for at least a little more balanced scheduling across college football.
I don't know when it became the burden of P5 schools to keep FCS ADs afloat, but I think it's beyond silly.
Edited by Fool on the Hill at 20:14:10 on 07/11/20
Mine: Nine conference games, three non-con. Two of the three must be P5, and the third must at least be D1. No more FCS opponents.
My rationale as an MU fan: If this program ever gets to the place where we want to see it, then MU will be looked at as a feared opponent instead of us saying we shouldn't schedule Wisconsin or whomever. I'd rather see a competitive loss to a team like that than MU wiping the field with Delaware St. or SEMO. Also, It would draw more fans to the stadium, be better TV viewing, and make for at least a little more balanced scheduling across college football.
I don't know when it became the burden of P5 schools to keep FCS ADs afloat, but I think it's beyond silly.
Edited by Fool on the Hill at 20:14:10 on 07/11/20
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Let's see your preferences for across the board scheduling - Fool on the Hill MU - 7/11 20:11:00
- 
-