Welcome Guest

no, for taking a position not based on what you think, but

Posted on: July 11, 2020 at 18:49:34 CT

90Tiger STL

Posts:

163798

Member For:

23.39 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

rather how it aligns with some odd ideology or political alignment.

This is a very incorrect action in my view.

What's your personal view?

Someone threatens my home, wife, pets, I'm defending.

You?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

so they got their guns taken - tigerinhogtown STL - 7/11 17:39:19

Outrageous misbehavior by Gardner - JG A - 7/11 18:18:57

Shannon must have slept late....nm - tigertix MU - 7/11 18:02:41

They're evidence of a crime... - markymarksthirdnipple STL - 7/11 17:44:08

Lol, goddamn (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 7/11 23:12:30

Lol no and no (nm) - pickle MU

- 7/11 19:33:05

lol. No(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 7/11 18:25:54

No they aren't (nm) - Sal MU

- 7/11 18:02:23

They are evidence in a criminal case, einsal... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 18:06:29

No they aren’t (nm) - pickle MU

- 7/11 19:33:26

Yes, pickle - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 20:11:27

lol no. there was no crime - pickle MU

- 7/11 20:18:43

There are criminal charges, Pickle... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 20:20:57

RE: They are evidence in a criminal case: Gardner just - BH O'bonga MU - 7/11 18:30:04

you're pathetic (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 18:27:13

LOL For understanding that they've been charged - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 18:29:59

no, for taking a position not based on what you think, but - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 18:49:34

The OP wasn't about - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 19:22:10

Why can't you answer a simple question? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 19:22:39

RE: LOL For understanding that they've been charged - *M* KC - 7/11 18:40:06

Incorrect, as usual. How do you feel about the legality of - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 18:50:10

Husband was legal. Wife was borderline - *M* KC - 7/11 19:34:52

it matters. I never argued whether the legal process wasq - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 19:40:46

You're such a silly little man. - *M* KC - 7/11 19:51:21

link to where I was wrong in this thread? Go for it (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 19:59:10

Well, he's never been anything but a miserable priick so - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 18:48:07

You're a liberal? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 18:51:24

I'm not a miserable priick like you, doc - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 19:09:02

stop diverting and deflecting. this has nothing to do with - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 19:16:04

No, you quack - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 19:29:15

and it's no crime - you just stated so, you pathetic - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 19:35:39

No, you quack...I never stated it wasn't a crime, - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 20:19:05

so you think it was a crime and shouldn't be charged? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 20:35:20

What are they charged with, MR? - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 20:39:19

why can't you answer a question? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 22:26:50

that appears to have been very hard for you - why not - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 19:34:01

Try to think for yourself ... for once (nm) - Sal MU

- 7/11 18:06:59

They are evidence in a criminal case, einsal... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 18:08:04

What was the crime - Sal MU

- 7/11 18:08:40

Were they charged with a crime, einsal? - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 18:10:16

Stop avoiding the questions - Sal MU

- 7/11 18:11:04

Stop being stoopid - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 18:19:03

so your position is the gvmt is always justified in charging - 90Tiger STL - 7/11 18:51:07

No, - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/11 20:27:18

There was no crime - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/11 17:57:03

Crimes have victims(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 7/11 17:47:52