Welcome Guest

RE: My concern with CHK are the assets, I have two

Posted on: June 11, 2020 at 21:04:14 CT
KC rules MU
Posts:
8829
Member For:
12.19 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Chesapeake has a high cost of supply; a characteristic of a porfolio too focused on shale compared to conventional assets. They have to keep drilling to access PUD with shale and nobody can due that profitably when the price is $35/barrel. Conventional reservoirs can still produce at relatively low operating costs.

Edited by KC rules at 21:29:06 on 06/11/20
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Chesapeake Energy Corporation - MOCO SON MU - 6/10 10:57:51
     Still overvalued - ashtray UF - 6/10 16:58:07
     Chesapeake and anyone associated with the senior management - MU-TULSA MU - 6/10 14:12:08
          Chesapeake actually has assets - KC rules MU - 6/11 13:19:47
               My concern with CHK are the assets, I have two - MU-TULSA MU - 6/11 14:01:35
                    RE: My concern with CHK are the assets, I have two - MOCO SON MU - 6/13 19:00:25
                         Unless reservoir analysis has changed in the past few years - MU-TULSA MU - 6/14 18:44:12
                    RE: My concern with CHK are the assets, I have two - KC rules MU - 6/11 21:04:14




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard