Welcome Guest

they had his 302. they say as much in their texts. Page

Posted on: May 22, 2020 at 22:09:42 CT

blake1771 MU

Posts:

14200

Member For:

18.80 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

admonishes dear Peter for a crappy 302 and he says something along the lines of well you should have seen what I had to work with. implying, based on them saying they were trying to keep Peintka's voice, that his original report sucked in their opinion.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Flynn-Kislyak transcripts... - MUTGR MU - 5/22 21:36:29

Wouldn't it be interesting if these transcripts were big - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 5/22 21:42:01

they had his 302. they say as much in their texts. Page - blake1771 MU - 5/22 22:09:42

RE: they had his 302. they say as much in their texts. Page - BH O'bonga MU - 5/22 23:03:11

RE: Wouldn't it be interesting if these transcripts were big - MUTGR MU - 5/22 21:44:20

Somewhere Joe Pientkas notes exist.(nm) - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 5/22 21:47:03

it's possible Pientka has flipped which is AN explanation as - blake1771 MU - 5/22 22:18:49

RE: it's possible Pientka has flipped which is AN explanation as - BH O'bonga MU - 5/23 06:48:54

Sonewhere the 302 exists - or evidence of it - MUTGR MU - 5/22 21:48:40