 |
|
so you don't think it's possible to plead to something
Posted on: May 7, 2020 at 14:20:20 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14360
Member For:
19.89 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
under duress? hell, every day in traffic court people plea to broken taillights in lieu of a more serious speeding charge all the time.
similar on a civil side of people settling to avoid spending more to defend themselves.
that's before we even get to the point that he was illegally unmasked. the transcript and his name were illegally leaked. he was cleared in an investigation and then they decided to pursue a bull**** logan act violation. they leaked to the press that the FBI had cleared him the day before going to interview him. they told him he didn't need an attorney (he clearly did as he was under investigation), did an end-around on normal protocol. talked beforehand about a perjury trap. decided to interview him about something they had the transcript for so what he said about it was immaterial. didn't give him a 1001 admonition. didn't allow him to review the transcripts. there's a lot of abnormalities on how the 302 was completed and edited. the DoJ committed Brady and Giglio violations.
the list goes on and on and on. and EVEN if you think he lied which is not in evidence b/c even his own attorney has never seen the transcript of the call all of the government misdeeds outweigh anything that he did. and sometimes the gov't needs to be taught this lesson that guilty people will go free if you cut corners and use illegal tactics to prove their guilt.
similar on a civil side of people settling to avoid spending more to defend themselves.
that's before we even get to the point that he was illegally unmasked. the transcript and his name were illegally leaked. he was cleared in an investigation and then they decided to pursue a bull**** logan act violation. they leaked to the press that the FBI had cleared him the day before going to interview him. they told him he didn't need an attorney (he clearly did as he was under investigation), did an end-around on normal protocol. talked beforehand about a perjury trap. decided to interview him about something they had the transcript for so what he said about it was immaterial. didn't give him a 1001 admonition. didn't allow him to review the transcripts. there's a lot of abnormalities on how the 302 was completed and edited. the DoJ committed Brady and Giglio violations.
the list goes on and on and on. and EVEN if you think he lied which is not in evidence b/c even his own attorney has never seen the transcript of the call all of the government misdeeds outweigh anything that he did. and sometimes the gov't needs to be taught this lesson that guilty people will go free if you cut corners and use illegal tactics to prove their guilt.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
so you don't think it's possible to plead to something - blake1771 MU - 5/7 14:20:20