Why won't you specifically respond?
Posted on: April 13, 2020 at 11:11:24 CT
4TigersinMichigan MU
Posts:
126078
Member For:
22.63 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
12
Your point is 22,000 deaths is sufficiently high for actions. We lose far more than that to other things the government could step in and prevent. What is your number when this is prudent and correct action by the government?
Or is evasive snark all you are prepared to share on the topic?