Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Golfer dropped by sponsors for homophobic and insensitive

Posted on: March 6, 2020 at 11:38:03 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68185
Member For:
9.67 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
comments on social media.

The article did not say what the offensive or homophobic comments were. I guess we should trust the media.

If they say it was offensive, it was offensive.


https://sports.yahoo.com/pga-tour-scott-piercy-dropped-by-sponsors-titleist-footjoy-over-homophobic-social-media-posts-donald-trump-pete-buttigieg-225141453.html
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Golfer dropped by sponsors for homophobic and insensitive - hokie VT - 3/6 11:38:03
     RE: Golfer dropped by sponsors for homophobic and insensitive - MUDude MU - 3/6 15:24:09
     Im still waiting for sponsors to drop high profile.... - JayRoy KC - 3/6 13:59:00
     High profile individuals that say or do things that offend - Ferg STL - 3/6 11:58:16
          BUT I'M MAD AT YAHOO! AFFIRM ME!(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 12:11:19
          Not the point. Why didn't the article reveal the reason for - hokie VT - 3/6 11:59:56
               It did say the reason. - Ferg STL - 3/6 12:42:32
               take it to the journalism board cookie (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 3/6 12:10:48
               It did, Brenda. It was a meme that made fun of Pete being - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 12:02:45
                    STFU, fatass. - Emoji Man MSU - 3/6 16:07:17
               it did (nm) - pickle MU - 3/6 12:01:40
     I'm sure that you could find it yourself hokey. - tigerdb MU - 3/6 11:54:45
          Of course i could. When i read an article i plan on looking - hokie VT - 3/6 12:07:48
               lol (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/6 12:12:45
               The article that you linked provided a pretty good - tigerdb MU - 3/6 12:10:29
     Whatever he said, if his sponsors deem it offensive - Newcatbirdseat MU - 3/6 11:51:23
          You have no curiosity at all? You accept their opinion of - hokie VT - 3/6 11:56:10
               do you need to agree with them? - ashtray UF - 3/6 12:05:06
                    Asstray, i am demoting you to "barely worth reading" and - hokie VT - 3/6 12:12:38
                         I'm crushed - ashtray UF - 3/6 12:13:48
                         He will be crushed that you will no longer affirm him(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 12:13:37
               Using your logic, if the media reports on someone being - tigerdb MU - 3/6 11:59:17
               LMFAO. Damn! Take charge of your life - pickle MU - 3/6 11:58:24
               AFFIRM ME GODDAMMIT! (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 11:56:55
                    He's right. Validation is the correct word, not - glue MU - 3/6 12:05:40
                         he wants both (nm) - pickle MU - 3/6 12:12:34
                         No, he wants affirmation. (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 12:07:27
                              We can agree to disagree. - glue MU - 3/6 12:08:02
                                   Fair enough (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 12:14:42
                    You and the idiots have latched on to that word as if it - hokie VT - 3/6 11:58:43
                         There really is no other word that describes your reaction - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 12:06:32
                              Stupid people often say, "there is no other way to describe - hokie VT - 3/6 12:10:55
                                   Have you considered the problem is not others, but you?(nm) - pickle MU - 3/6 12:15:57
                                        Now that's just silly talk. How could he get affirmation - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 12:17:24
                                   Do they? Find me an article that proves that. I'm too - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 12:12:45
     lol(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 3/6 11:50:54
     It doesn’t matter the reason. It’s called property rights - pickle MU - 3/6 11:48:27
     So, because you feel uninformed you mad at the media? - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 11:41:36
          Shoddy journalism doesn't bother you? You accept what they - hokie VT - 3/6 11:43:49
               lol wow (nm) - pickle MU - 3/6 11:48:59
               What was shoddy about it. It says that his sponsors dropped - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 11:46:15
                    That's fine. I'm sure the media only presents fair unbiased - hokie VT - 3/6 11:48:17
                         the article that you linked even posted his take: - tigerdb MU - 3/6 12:07:39
                         RE: That's fine. I'm sure the media only presents fair unbiased - MrBlueSky MU - 3/6 11:53:05
                              Was that in the article? nm - hokie VT - 3/6 12:05:35
                         I just googled it and found plenty of info on it. You are - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 11:52:23
               lol (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/6 11:44:38
                    He will get even angrier over the lack of affirmation (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 11:47:12
                         You are usually better than the gaggle of idiots. I guess - hokie VT - 3/6 11:50:28
                              lmao (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/6 11:52:56
                              Lol. Wow. You are so needy(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 3/6 11:51:11
     outlaw sponsors dropping golfers (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 3/6 11:40:53
     My guess is it's neither. Twitter ban, Truth we dont like - Coors4bob MU - 3/6 11:40:32
     Companies can sponsor who they please - MrBlueSky MU - 3/6 11:40:30
          We will have no humor! None! - Coors4bob MU - 3/6 11:41:50
               Whether it's humerous or not is irrelevant. - MrBlueSky MU - 3/6 11:53:34
                    I don't disagree. but peple need to lighten up about fags. - Coors4bob MU - 3/6 12:47:25




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard