Welcome Guest

It would be a matter for both

Posted on: March 5, 2020 at 08:54:50 CT

4TigersinMichigan MU

Posts:

126948

Member For:

22.79 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

The legal matter would rest with the FBI. The Senate rules of decorum and behavior rest with the Senate.

Threatening justices by name is not partisan speech.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Chuck Schemer threatened two justices. Iiuc, it takes five - hokie VT - 3/5 08:35:18

He threatened the two Trump appointed justices - mu7176grad MU - 3/5 08:39:33

So. They still need three more. He pretended this is about - hokie VT - 3/5 08:44:49

lol. think bro (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 3/5 08:46:03

Sounds like Cocaine Mitch may pursue this in the Senate - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 08:41:37

why? (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/5 08:44:58

Because much of Schumer's argument against Trump - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 08:49:24

If schumer actually threatened members of the scotus, - tigerdb MU - 3/5 08:52:35

It would be a matter for both - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 08:54:50

Yup. The very stupid will say it’s a matter for the - hokie VT - 3/5 09:05:45

lol (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/5 08:52:25

Because liberals are primarily driven by emotion, not reason - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 08:37:55

think a little harder cookie™ (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 3/5 08:36:08

Those too stupid to formulate an opinion and articulate it - hokie VT - 3/5 08:40:10

because it would be a good exercise for you to try to - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 3/5 08:41:44

Once again, being vague doesn’t protect from looking stupid. - hokie VT - 3/5 08:46:34

If you have four pennies in your pocket, and you need five - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 3/5 08:47:53

why are you attacking him? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 3/5 08:54:54

I dunno, it's kinda fun? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 3/5 09:16:15

it's so vague! (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/5 08:49:03

he'd have to have one - ashtray UF - 3/5 08:45:57

he'd just get a headache - ashtray UF - 3/5 08:38:53