Welcome Guest

"like" who and no to the second comment

Posted on: March 3, 2020 at 08:21:31 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
185689
Member For:
24.00 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
5
O'Rourke made a big splash almost taking out Cruz and thought he could use a failed Senate run as the basis for a presidential run. He was woefully incorrect. He may at some point become a force in TX politics. And my interest in Texas politics is nil. I think access to firearms in the US is both ludicrous and dangerous and some legislation is called for to scale that back. Banning the sale of Assault Weapons.

TRY FACTS BOY: "On the presidential campaign trail in Iowa and on the op-ed page of The New York Times, former Vice President Joe Biden has made the case for going back to a nationwide ban on assault weapons and making it "even stronger."

Some have reacted with quizzical expressions: "Back?" "Stronger?"

Yes. Twenty five years ago, when Biden was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Congress passed the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act — commonly called the assault weapons ban.

It prohibited the manufacture or sale for civilian use of certain semi-automatic weapons. The act also banned magazines that could accommodate 10 rounds or more.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     I don't think any of that is true - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 07:45:02
          what? (nm) - Sal MU - 3/3 07:48:14
               Biden did not suggest support of firearm confistaction - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 07:56:54
                    Just putting the guy that supports it in charge - kp83 MU - 3/3 08:00:20
                         You are not saying anything I did not say - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:05:43
                              So FakeMexican was lying?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 3/3 08:07:07
                                   O'Rourke was out of his depth making some breathless comment - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:14:44
                                        It wasn't a breathless comment ... it's how he feels - Sal MU - 3/3 08:23:57
                                             Actually it was breathless comment. Exactly - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:27:13
                                                  Here's him bragging about saying it. - dangertim MU - 3/3 08:36:55
                                                       Buybacks - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:43:15
                                                            what do you think a mandatory buyback is? (nm) - Sal MU - 3/3 08:48:08
                                                                 Jack-booted thugs storming homes is what it is(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:51:14
                                                                      what does mandatory mean? (nm) - pickle MU - 3/3 09:26:26
                                                                           Like a motorcycle - required by law - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 09:41:59
                                                                           RE: what does mandatory mean? (nm) - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 09:39:27
                                                                                what does mandatory mean? (nm) - pickle MU - 3/3 10:58:51
                                                                           Not his concern (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 09:28:27
                                                       BREATHLESS! (nm) - Sal MU - 3/3 08:37:38
                                                            The man is CLEARLY GASPING for breath - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:44:19
                                                  "middle of the road liberal" - ashtray UF - 3/3 08:29:31
                                                       Yes, pretty simple - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:48:27
                                                            That's not all you support - ashtray UF - 3/3 09:18:01
                                                                 That is pretty comprehensive, if you think otherwise - - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 09:42:53
                                                  So O'Rourke didn't really mean it? (nm) - Sal MU - 3/3 08:27:37
                                                       Really don't care, not that taken with the guy(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:51:45
                                        Again, you lie on top of your lies. There's not a single - hefeweizen MU - 3/3 08:16:07
                                             You're big on broad over-statements. What lie?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:22:21
                    The fake Mexican is for confiscation you dishonest pos - hefeweizen MU - 3/3 07:58:30
                         One comment - I don't rightly care, so I am not going argue - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:07:43
                              You like him because you support confiscation you dishonest - hefeweizen MU - 3/3 08:10:47
                                   "like" who and no to the second comment - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:21:31
          I am not sure how you classify 2A "supporters", but many - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 07:47:15
               "shall not infringe" What does that mean? (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 08:13:20
                    Not my concern(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:24:49
                         Then you have no standing - ashtray UF - 3/3 08:28:16
                              Ha ha ha ha ha - you're a real laugh-riot(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:52:50
               They don't support confiscation (nm) - Sal MU - 3/3 07:48:24
                    Who said they did? (nm) - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:00:28
                         You do. You are just too dishonest to say it.(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 3/3 08:11:48
                              Prove it, boy. - raskolnikov MU - 3/3 08:23:34
                                   RE: Prove it, boy. - Sal MU - 3/3 08:42:02




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard