 |
|
I would argue that Mizzou fouls a lot In the context of
Posted on: February 12, 2020 at 09:25:29 CT
alwaysright MU
Posts:
48928
Member For:
16.94 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
How the rulebook is actually written. It is true that we do not fit this modern interpretation they are trying to force on us.
By definition, a foul is contact that gives one player an advantage. Yes, there are lots of times that we touch the guy, but that does not mean it is a foul.
Most the contact is actually caused by the offensive player, but poor interpretations of defensive position results in all of those being called fouls on the defender. A LOT should be no calls, some should be offensive fouls. Either would discourage the offensive player from approaching the contact
By definition, a foul is contact that gives one player an advantage. Yes, there are lots of times that we touch the guy, but that does not mean it is a foul.
Most the contact is actually caused by the offensive player, but poor interpretations of defensive position results in all of those being called fouls on the defender. A LOT should be no calls, some should be offensive fouls. Either would discourage the offensive player from approaching the contact
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
I would argue that Mizzou fouls a lot In the context of - alwaysright MU - 2/12 09:25:29