 |
|
more importantly he had no legal basis for that ruling.
Posted on: February 8, 2020 at 10:03:10 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14273
Member For:
19.38 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The OLC ruled that the so-called wb's complaint wasn't an urgent concern so never should have been accepted as such. but even at that, a wb, contrary to dem talking points, has no legal protection of anonymity.
so I'd like to know what legal rationale Roberts relied upon to come to that decision.
so I'd like to know what legal rationale Roberts relied upon to come to that decision.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
more importantly he had no legal basis for that ruling. - blake1771 MU - 2/8 10:03:10