Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Liberals, why are you against separation of powers? (nm)

Posted on: February 7, 2020 at 15:31:53 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Liberals, why are you against separation of powers? (nm) - Sal MU - 2/7 15:31:53
     Communists require a large, omnipotent central government. - jonesin - 2/7 15:43:55
          trump has created the largest central government ever(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/7 16:19:39
               No...No. The central government has created the central - jonesin - 2/7 16:50:18
     Your question is based on a false premise. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:37:25
          No it's not (nm) - Sal MU - 2/7 15:39:00
               Yeah, it is. It is the GOP who seem to think that Congress - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:44:16
                    lol it's the left stating the exact opposite - Sal MU - 2/7 15:49:50
                         Lawful demands, absolutely. The blanket denial of all - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:53:27
                              Says who? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/7 15:54:38
                                   See United States vs. Nixon (1974) nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:57:07
                                        what does the judical process have to do with congress?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/7 16:13:38
                                        "not immune to judicial review" (nm) - Sal MU - 2/7 16:07:10
                                        I'm going to happy hour, but I can't wait to read your - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/7 15:58:30
                                        What did that case hold? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/7 15:57:40
                    Not one member of the GOP has said that the - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/7 15:47:03
                         And you have misrepresented what I said, as usual. - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:50:28
                              Again you don't understand what those checks involve - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/7 15:52:17
                                   Your inability to tell the truth is eternal. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:53:58
                                        yeah go ahead and tap out - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/7 15:54:56
                              you obviously don't understand that (nm) - Sal MU - 2/7 15:51:03
                                   Obviously I do. I'm sorry that fact doesn't correlate - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:51:46
                                        You don't believe the judicial should have - Sal MU - 2/7 15:54:01
                                             Judicial precedent has already largely resolved that issue. - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:56:09
                                                  lol what? Can you point me to a SCOTUS case - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/7 15:57:08
                         McConnell said it when he said he was coordinating - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:49:02
                              No he absolutely did not, again that is faulty - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/7 15:50:23
                                   No, it is simply another lie on your part, as you do so - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:50:58
                                        Your inability to understand something is no reflection on - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/7 15:51:41
                                             Your inability to tell the truth is eternal. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/7 15:52:15




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard