 |
|
Posted this earlier but right before The Chest spoke so it
Posted on: February 6, 2020 at 16:01:59 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
64005
Member For:
8.88 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
got lost.
Or maybe my post is just crap and the idiots were too polite to point that out.
Again, for your reading pleasure....
.......
Socialists rejoice in Romney vote. Bipartisan support to convict and remove the president.
And, while each and every socialist searched their souls and hearts, and prayed for guidance and the wisdom to make the best choice for the nation they love so dearly, the evil Republicans all voted strictly on the basis of party to protect the evil president.
Romney represents courage, the socialists represent principle.
Republicans represent only partisanship.
As I see it, the mountain of evidence, the overwhelming proof that they put on display Garnered one vote from one Trump hating rino. One Republican who was looking for any excuse to spit in the eye of the president.
And they were so close. They needed 67 votes to convict, and their overwhelming evidence convinced 48 senators. Wow, so close. They got 70% of the votes they needed.
That should be close enough for socialists. Some of them are black and their votes should count more. Fairness.
And what about super delegates that they use in primaries, are they available here?
Obviously, all these silly rules were thought up centuries ago to defeat socialists and keep the black man down. Laws that require the house of reprehensibles for example, to handle the evidentiary stage of the impeachment process, and have the Senate vote on the evidence provided by the house. Socialists should not have to follow rules like that.
And the 2/3 rule to convict is obviously derived from the 3/5 of a person rule originally assigned to colored people by the racist founders of this terrible country. I mean this great and glorious nation. Not sure...
Rules and laws should only apply when they work to the benefit of the socialists. At all other times, rules and laws are outdated and racist.
The socialists were SO CLOSE to getting a conviction. They tried so hard. They should be given the benefit of the doubt.
It was after all, bipartisan.
Or maybe my post is just crap and the idiots were too polite to point that out.
Again, for your reading pleasure....
.......
Socialists rejoice in Romney vote. Bipartisan support to convict and remove the president.
And, while each and every socialist searched their souls and hearts, and prayed for guidance and the wisdom to make the best choice for the nation they love so dearly, the evil Republicans all voted strictly on the basis of party to protect the evil president.
Romney represents courage, the socialists represent principle.
Republicans represent only partisanship.
As I see it, the mountain of evidence, the overwhelming proof that they put on display Garnered one vote from one Trump hating rino. One Republican who was looking for any excuse to spit in the eye of the president.
And they were so close. They needed 67 votes to convict, and their overwhelming evidence convinced 48 senators. Wow, so close. They got 70% of the votes they needed.
That should be close enough for socialists. Some of them are black and their votes should count more. Fairness.
And what about super delegates that they use in primaries, are they available here?
Obviously, all these silly rules were thought up centuries ago to defeat socialists and keep the black man down. Laws that require the house of reprehensibles for example, to handle the evidentiary stage of the impeachment process, and have the Senate vote on the evidence provided by the house. Socialists should not have to follow rules like that.
And the 2/3 rule to convict is obviously derived from the 3/5 of a person rule originally assigned to colored people by the racist founders of this terrible country. I mean this great and glorious nation. Not sure...
Rules and laws should only apply when they work to the benefit of the socialists. At all other times, rules and laws are outdated and racist.
The socialists were SO CLOSE to getting a conviction. They tried so hard. They should be given the benefit of the doubt.
It was after all, bipartisan.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Posted this earlier but right before The Chest spoke so it - hokie VT - 2/6 16:01:59
-