Welcome Guest

So in the future, the majority in the house of

Posted on: January 31, 2020 at 15:30:12 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68139
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
reprehensibles hurries through an impeachment proceeding of a prez they don't like. They call virtually all the witnesses, some in secret, and don’t allow the president to cross examine.

The house manager lied multiple times and is a fact witness in the proceedings.

In the house, the intel committee chair does not even attend hearings in the judiciary committee lest he be asked a question.

The house of reprehensibles makes a conscious decision not to subpoena certain witnesses. It would take too much time.

Impeachment is approved without a single vote from the minority party.

The slap Dash impeachment is then sent to the Senate, a full 33 days after the articles were urgently voted on. Had to wait for nancy’s pens to arrive. The articles allege no criminal activity.

Amazingly, the articles of age no criminal activity. Not even alleged.

After being humiliated for about a week on the floor of the US Senate, house managers demand the witnesses the house chose not to call in the house, be compelled to testify in the senate.

The senate according to a house manager is traitorous if they don’t do the work of the house as well as their own.

So, all the house needs is a majority party that is corrupt enough to do essentially nothing but vote for impeachment in the house and give a half baked cake to the senate. At their leisure of course.

And the house managers have the audacity to say, “OK Senate, here’s what we want you to do.“

Now, imagine the house is republican and the president is a democrat.

Edited by hokie at 15:32:09 on 01/31/20
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

So in the future, the majority in the house of - hokie VT - 1/31 15:30:12
     Dpsht, it is an election year - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 15:56:15
          is that what the whole thing is about? - pickle MU - 1/31 16:14:47
     ^ supports gvmt and thinks it’s necessary (nm) - pickle MU - 1/31 15:45:41
     Is that the Rush summary - meatiger MU - 1/31 15:32:55
          No. Was it in error? Nm - hokie VT - 1/31 15:35:07
               Well - meatiger MU - 1/31 15:36:57
                    I don’t know what you’re talking about. Do you? Nm - hokie VT - 1/31 15:38:26
                         RE: I don’t know what you’re talking about. Do you? Nm - meatiger MU - 1/31 15:41:04
          Rush or Hannity - MrBlueSky MU - 1/31 15:34:56
               Let me turn that around - who has told you that rank and - Reagan STL - 1/31 15:46:42
               Was it in error? Nm - hokie VT - 1/31 15:37:20




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard