RE: seeking darkness but light: What first hand info? The
Posted on: January 29, 2020 at 07:36:33 CT
BH O'bonga MU
Posts:
26493
Member For:
5.64 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
NYTimes admitted in their hit piece that they had not seen the section of the book cited, but had been tipped off by an anonymous source. The Times is three steps removed from the alleged 'first hand info'. You are four times removed. The hit piece was no different from others that have attacked Trump. There is no reason to call witnesses, unless a crime or impeachable offense has been identified. The House dems failed in this effort and the Senate should shut it down tomorrow.