Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

1) Schiff to discuss his actions vis-à-vis the WB

Posted on: January 28, 2020 at 18:19:38 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146273
Member For:
20.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
5
2) The WB to get a perjury charge on Schiff's testimony (and likely LTC Vindman's House testimony)
3) Hunter Biden
4) Joe Biden
5) Viktor Shokin the fired Ukraine prosecutor to discuss his investigation into Burisma and his firing
6) Petro Poroshenko to discuss the Biden blackmail scheme
7) Volodymyr Zelensky to discuss the quid pro quo
8) Andriy Telizhenko who attended Obama/Biden's Jan 19, 2016 WH meeting where they sought Ukrainian official help to undermine Trump’s 2016 campaign.
9) The Taco Bell Lady to testify about how she bragged about successfully coordinating between the Ukrainian government officials and the DNC to get negative information about Paul Manafort into public
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Bring on all witnesses. We should also get the - tman MU - 1/28 18:15:26
     RE: Bring on all witnesses: Atkinson and Ciaramella will be - BH O'bonga MU - 1/28 18:50:59
          Why?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/28 20:16:58
               RE: Why?(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 1/28 20:25:46
          that's cool, with Bolton, Mulvaney, Guiliani, Barr and - tigerdb MU - 1/28 18:55:30
     The witness part is easy-R’s have the majority to call them(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/28 18:45:49
          correct, and I'm not against it - Sal MU - 1/28 19:32:17
               It is? - ashtray UF - 1/28 20:00:12
                    Simple solution - Sal MU - 1/28 20:16:06
                         Too easy - ashtray UF - 1/28 21:05:59
          If they go down this path. Hope trial lasts through - tman MU - 1/28 18:52:32
     1) Schiff to discuss his actions vis-à-vis the WB - Spanky KU - 1/28 18:19:38
          Schiff is the whistleblower - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/28 19:06:23
          RE: 1) Schiff to discuss his actions vis-à-vis the WB - BH O'bonga MU - 1/28 18:52:51
          How many times will you post that nonsense?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/28 18:31:15
               do you object? - Spanky KU - 1/28 18:42:58
               Why(nm) - tman MU - 1/28 18:38:30
          The Biden's will take the 5th, waste of time...nm - tigertix MU - 1/28 18:22:17
               That would be a classic - Spanky KU - 1/28 18:43:58
                    So why aren’t the R’s calling them?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/28 18:49:45
                         Wait to see if witnesses are called - Spanky KU - 1/28 22:57:59
                         They may. If they dont however, the - tman MU - 1/28 19:01:05
                              Objection, let the witness answer the ?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/28 19:09:23
                                   Of course and let's apply the federal rules - tman MU - 1/28 19:50:14
                                        Would that include the ability for the prosecution - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/29 08:25:55
                                        I was referring to spanky answering my ?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 1/28 20:13:07
     Have the NSC release the manuscript - Sal MU - 1/28 18:17:31
          whoops wrong placement * - Mo Texan MU - 1/28 19:05:22
          It's going to be published soon. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/28 18:18:56
               It isn't coming out until March - Sal MU - 1/28 18:29:28
               The only testimony Schiff hasn't released is the ICIG - Spanky KU - 1/28 18:22:04
                    Yeah, that's odd (nm) - Sal MU - 1/28 18:29:39




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard