Welcome Guest

Prove ??

Posted on: January 21, 2020 at 10:16:26 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
182950
Member For:
23.52 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Hearings are not the place of proofs. Trials are. Unless of course you can pull the neat trick of prohibiting all evidence, but then that would not be a trial would it?

And as for your idea that the "left" did not Prove Trump did as they claim - there has not been one piece of evidence that he did not. The facts are not in dispute here. At least, the WH team has not disputed them. Perfect call right? THAT is interpretation. That is opinion. FACT is that Trump said he needed a favor first - and we have seen evidence bullding up to this call for months that said favor was ANNOUNCEMENT of investigation into the domestic rival of Mr Trump - and that military aid would NOT be forthcoming prior to said announcement. Said aid only came forth when they (Trump/Rudy) got busted.

Facts matter, not opinions.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Dershowitz - Ace A - 1/21 09:30:49
     RE: Dershowitz - MOCO SON MU - 1/21 10:51:51
     Well, that isn't what Dershowitz said (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 09:31:22
          Tell us what you think Dershowitz said - Ace A - 1/21 09:37:04
               He's simply making the argument that no - Sal MU - 1/21 09:41:47
                    That is wrong on lots of levels- Trump HAS been impeached - raskolnikov MU - 1/21 10:00:01
                         Lol what's wrong about that statement? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 10:02:56
                              The statement implies that Trump has committed no crime - raskolnikov MU - 1/21 10:09:54
                    But there is a crime, per the GAO - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/21 09:43:10
                         The GAO doesn't decide whether or not a crime was - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/21 10:11:01
                              LOL, neither does your statement, or those of his attorneys - Mormad MU - 1/21 10:47:24
                         So should every President then be impeached? - DiggerPhelps STL - 1/21 09:44:48
                              Not all crimes are impeachable, but that Trump did this - raskolnikov MU - 1/21 10:01:59
                                   The left failed to prove what you claim (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 10:03:30
                                        Prove ?? - raskolnikov MU - 1/21 10:16:26
                                             um, investigations are done to collect the required - Sal MU - 1/21 10:17:23
                                                  No. Information is gathered to try a case - raskolnikov MU - 1/21 10:21:59
                                                       They weren't deprived, the left rushed the process - Sal MU - 1/21 10:24:45
                                                            They did. They subpoened McCabe and 8 months later - raskolnikov MU - 1/21 10:58:42
                              If Congress determines that such crime by the - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/21 09:50:25
                                   This is the penalty for the "crime" - dangertim MU - 1/21 09:57:22
                                        What still doesn't make sense is - Sal MU - 1/21 10:04:22
                                   That isn't the argument (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 09:50:58
                                        wrong (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/21 09:51:58
                              As I said yesterday, the left's GAO argument - Sal MU - 1/21 09:45:23
                         Within that statute there is a remedy - Sal MU - 1/21 09:44:28
                              Every crime has a remedy. They don't specify crimes without - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/21 09:48:08
                                   lol so it lists a very specific remedy - Sal MU - 1/21 09:49:46
                                        whether or not that remedy is followed is irrelevant - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/21 09:50:58
                                             It's not irrelevant at all (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 09:51:26
                                                  RE: It's not irrelevant at all (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/21 09:52:08
                                   so Obama's 7 violations were impeachable?(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/21 09:49:01
                                        Anything Obama did was potentially impeachable - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/21 09:51:44
                                             You didn't answer the question (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 09:53:25
                                                  RE: You didn't answer the question (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/21 09:56:53
                                                       So you think Obama should have been impeached? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 10:03:46
                                                            He answered you nitwit - JayHoaxH8r MU - 1/21 10:09:58
                                                                 It's a yes or no question (nm) - Sal MU - 1/21 10:11:17
                                                                      Derp - JayHoaxH8r MU - 1/21 10:18:02
                              Why don't you tell doc what the remedy is. I'm sure he'd - dangertim MU - 1/21 09:46:30
               I'll help . Sally will dance around like usual. - JayHoaxH8r MU - 1/21 09:37:58
                    That part is true and frames the argument nicely - Mormad MU - 1/21 09:40:40




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard