 |
|
"The Evidence Refutes" part 2
Posted on: January 20, 2020 at 12:33:59 CT
tigerinhogtown STL
Posts:
64080
Member For:
24.43 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Before they had even seen the transcript,
though, House Democrats concocted all their charges based on distortions peddled by a so-called
whistleblower who had no first-hand knowledge of the call. And contrary to their claims, the
transcript proves that the President did not seek to use either security assistance or a presidential
meeting as leverage to pressure Ukrainians to announce investigations on two subjects: (i) possible
Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election; or (ii) an incident in which then-Vice President Biden
had forced the dismissal of a Ukrainian anti-corruption prosecutor who reportedly had been
investigating a company (Burisma) that paid Biden’s son, Hunter, to sit on its board.560
though, House Democrats concocted all their charges based on distortions peddled by a so-called
whistleblower who had no first-hand knowledge of the call. And contrary to their claims, the
transcript proves that the President did not seek to use either security assistance or a presidential
meeting as leverage to pressure Ukrainians to announce investigations on two subjects: (i) possible
Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election; or (ii) an incident in which then-Vice President Biden
had forced the dismissal of a Ukrainian anti-corruption prosecutor who reportedly had been
investigating a company (Burisma) that paid Biden’s son, Hunter, to sit on its board.560
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
"The Evidence Refutes" part 2 - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/20 12:33:59