Welcome Guest

RE: I'm not sure why she ever thought: You're right in

Posted on: January 10, 2020 at 11:21:05 CT

BH O'bonga MU

Posts:

26658

Member For:

5.68 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

wondering WTH she was thinking. House Dems have played this out about as poorly as was possible. For being credited as a political genius, Nancy sure looks stupid.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Signed, Speaker Pelosi - Ace AU - 1/10 11:05:48

It's not the Senate's job to provide evidence - Sal MU

- 1/10 11:17:04

Hey Sal - witnesses are evidence - raskolnikov MU - 1/10 11:32:48

you really are dumb as hell (nm) - Sal MU

- 1/10 11:58:08

no witnesses testified in Clinton's trial - Spanky KU - 1/10 11:56:57

RE: Hey Sal - witnesses are evidence - MOCO SON MU - 1/10 11:56:07

lol absolute mush head(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/10 11:36:21

Recall that the socialists and the media said that 3 Rs - hokie VT - 1/10 11:21:42

How hard it must be to have Pelosi & Schumer as ..... - El Zorro MU - 1/10 11:14:59

lol she's mad as hell Mitch got her again(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/10 11:07:13

Sen. McConnell - 1, Nancy the drunk - 0 - BH O'bonga MU - 1/10 11:15:22

I'm not sure why she ever thought - Sal MU

- 1/10 11:18:05

RE: I'm not sure why she ever thought: You're right in - BH O'bonga MU - 1/10 11:21:05

Witnessless trials = Cover up - raskolnikov MU - 1/10 11:15:16

RE: Witnessless trials = Cover up - MOCO SON MU - 1/10 12:03:04

GFY liar. House calls witnesses, not the senate. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/10 11:17:29

Right uh huh right, no stonewall here, no banning - raskolnikov MU - 1/10 11:39:00

Actually, turdball, your side stonewalled on witnesses. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/10 12:08:23

separation of powers - Sal MU

- 1/10 11:58:34

The Clinton trial moved forward without - Sal MU

- 1/10 11:17:20