 |
|
Again, you're making the mistake to think that these
Posted on: January 4, 2020 at 11:40:08 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.49 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
people would unprovokingly attack the United States.
But yes, you don't go start a war to prevent a war. It's basic and fundamental.
And if you are attacked, you don't politely ask them to stop. You repel the attack with the necessary force. Defense is justified.
"How many casualties are you willing to tolerate before you act?"
Zero.
"If your family were in an area targeted to attack and slaughter by the [attackers], you would wait until they were attacked and killed before doing anything."
I would wait until there was an imminent threat before doing something, obviously. I'm not going to travel ten thousand miles and kill some people to repel an attack on my family ten thousand miles back home. That doesn't make sense, and it's not justified.
Edited by ummmm at 11:40:37 on 01/04/20
But yes, you don't go start a war to prevent a war. It's basic and fundamental.
And if you are attacked, you don't politely ask them to stop. You repel the attack with the necessary force. Defense is justified.
"How many casualties are you willing to tolerate before you act?"
Zero.
"If your family were in an area targeted to attack and slaughter by the [attackers], you would wait until they were attacked and killed before doing anything."
I would wait until there was an imminent threat before doing something, obviously. I'm not going to travel ten thousand miles and kill some people to repel an attack on my family ten thousand miles back home. That doesn't make sense, and it's not justified.
Edited by ummmm at 11:40:37 on 01/04/20
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Again, you're making the mistake to think that these - ummmm MU - 1/4 11:40:08
-