Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

the WPA is unconstitutional (nm)

Posted on: January 3, 2020 at 16:48:46 CT
pickle MU
Posts:
267340
Member For:
26.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Are mutual defenses treaties constitutional?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/3 16:31:09
     They can be constitutional, but they are definitely against - ummmm MU - 1/3 16:34:55
          seems anything that reads something like "an act or war - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/3 16:38:28
               the WPA was and is an unconstitutional abdication - 90Tiger STL - 1/3 16:50:17
               the WPA is unconstitutional (nm) - pickle MU - 1/3 16:48:46




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard