Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

LOL---good one

Posted on: December 13, 2019 at 15:04:16 CT
mu7176grad MU
Posts:
60579
Member For:
21.96 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
next time real witnesses will help

You couldn't win a Associate Circuit Court case with these allegations. Trump is a jerk but that is not the standard for impeachment nor is refusing to answer subpoenas from the House . Should have gotten Court Orders or rulings

Edited by mu7176grad at 15:05:26 on 12/13/19
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The Case For Impeachment Is Overwhelming - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 14:59:37
     LOL. nm. - MUTGR MU - 12/13 17:35:51
     RE: The Case For Impeachment: Is this a joke? - BH O'bonga MU - 12/13 16:31:17
     these are interesting reads in retrospect. - dangertim MU - 12/13 16:24:21
     And the crime is...? - kp83 MU - 12/13 15:37:19
          Abuse of power, obstruction of justice. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:48:14
               Obstruction of Justice wasn't even one of the articles(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 12/13 18:11:24
               Not crimes, just whines - kp83 MU - 12/13 16:05:46
               those aren't crimes (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:50:05
                    RE: those aren't crimes (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:51:02
                         that isn't an article ... you are one dishonest hack (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:51:44
          RE: And the crime is...? - MOCO SON MU - 12/13 15:46:39
          He will never answer that, since he can't. And the fact - GA Tiger MU - 12/13 15:43:46
               I've answered it multiple times in this thread you ****ing - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:48:30
                    No you haven't - Sal MU - 12/13 15:54:12
     RE: The Case For Impeachment Is Overwhelming - scan MU - 12/13 15:34:11
     If the dems weren’t all socialists, - Sarazen MU - 12/13 15:32:39
     it's not. nobody but leftists care and all this will do is - blake1771 MU - 12/13 15:28:21
          blue also keeps confusing obstruction of justice - Sal MU - 12/13 15:29:06
               He has clearly obstructed justice many times as POTUS - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:34:07
                    so clear that Mueller couldn't even - Sal MU - 12/13 15:35:42
                         I know how they work. And Trump has ignored them. - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:46:54
                              "you're fine with that" - Sal MU - 12/13 15:49:43
                                   The courts ruled - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:50:39
                                        you really are dumb as hell (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:51:20
                                             Why do you support a President ignoring congressional - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:56:59
                                                  and who has oversight over congress? and who has oversight - blake1771 MU - 12/13 17:04:23
                                                  It's called checks and balances - Sal MU - 12/13 15:59:14
                    CLEARLY? you sure about that? why don't you tell me the - blake1771 MU - 12/13 15:34:54
                         He has stonewalled ALL congressional oversight - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:37:28
                              he has not stonewalled ALL congressional oversight since - blake1771 MU - 12/13 15:40:00
     An overwhelming case would have an actual - Sal MU - 12/13 15:14:32
          Abuse of power is 100% an impeachable offense - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:17:46
               abuse of power is ill defined and is actually NOT - blake1771 MU - 12/13 17:05:07
               I never said it wasn't (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:19:11
          False - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:15:55
               I never said it wasn't - Sal MU - 12/13 15:18:53
                    Which is? (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:21:30
                         There isn't any - Sal MU - 12/13 15:26:22
                              Abuse of power is an impeachable offense (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:30:38
                                   anything is an impeachable offense b/c it's political - Sal MU - 12/13 15:31:52
                                        In this case it should - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:34:28
     No high crime or even a low misdemeanor in sight - Spanky KU - 12/13 15:08:11
          Abuse of power, obstruction of justice. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:08:49
               obstruction of justice isn't one of the articles (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:31:15
                    You and I know that. - Tigrrrr! MU - 12/13 15:56:34
               Nope... try again. - Spanky KU - 12/13 15:28:49
                    False (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:31:03
     RE: The Case For Impeachment Is Overwhelming - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:06:02
     LOL---good one - mu7176grad MU - 12/13 15:04:16
          Notice the source (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:08:33
     I wish the right would read the 4th article of impeachment - Hamdogg KC - 12/13 15:01:03
          He does? You have a link for that?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/13 15:11:42
          That was attached to a crime (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:09:53
               Trump claiming immunity is the exact same thing - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:10:38
                    lol wut? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/13 15:12:27
                         He hasn't claimed executive privilege - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:13:56
                              So who decides legal conflicts between the Executive and - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/13 15:19:09
                              So go to court and compel him - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:15:12
                                   RE: So go to court and compel him - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:17:27
                                        The appeal is pending (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:18:24
                                             You say that as though Trump will actually comply - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:40:32
                                                  If McGhan won't comply with the final court - Sal MU - 12/13 15:46:24
                                                       That's not a given, failing to testify or honor a subpoena - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/13 15:59:18
                                             All they have to do is expedite the case - ashtray UF - 12/13 15:22:42
                    And that article was voted down for Clinton (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:12:27
          Yep - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:08:19
               When did Trump commit perjury? (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:10:36
                    He hasn't appeared under oath - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:11:18
                         So then ... it doesn't apply to him (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:11:48
                              RE: So then ... it doesn't apply to him (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:12:24
                                   Nope, that is for the courts to decide (nm) - Sal MU - 12/13 15:13:05
                                        And as I pointed out - MrBlueSky MU - 12/13 15:15:10
                                             And as I pointed out it's still pending - Sal MU - 12/13 15:18:11
                                        Better off arguing with your dog - mu7176grad MU - 12/13 15:14:32




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard