see what type of legal argument(s) upon which they are basing their position. I'd lose interest if they only used a circumstantial argument. There are two legitimate arguments that weigh against the circumstantial fiction.
https://law.missouri.edu/person/mary-m-beck/
Areas of Expertise
Adoption
Adult and Child Abuse
Assisted Reproductive Technology Law
Domestic Violence/Homicide
Frozen Pre-Implantation Embryo Disposition
Parental Rights
Surrogacy
https://mulaw.missouri.edu/lande/
What is your current position?
I am the Isidor Loeb Professor and Director of the LL.M. Program in Dispute
Resolution at the University of Missouri School of Law
https://law.missouri.edu/person/philip-g-peters-jr/
Areas of Expertise
Achievement Gap
Bioethics
Education Reform Law
Health Law
Medical Malpractice
Tort Law
https://law.missouri.edu/person/richard-c-reuben/
Areas of Expertise
Administrative Law
Arbitration
Campaign Finance Law
Civil Rights
Confidentiality of Dispute Resolution Professes
Conflict
Democracy
Election Law
Emotional Intelligence
Legislation
Local Government
Media Coverage of Conflict
Mediation
Mindfulness Education
Negotiation
Voting Rights
https://law.missouri.edu/person/rodney-j-uphoff/
Areas of Expertise
Criminal Case Strategy
Criminal Justice System
Criminal Procedure
Ethical Issues Involving Defense or Prosecution
Eyewitness Identification
Fourth Amendment
Indigent Defense
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Jury Selection
NCAA Committee on Infractions
Prosecutorial Misconduct
Role of the Criminal Defense Lawyer
South African Criminal Justice System
Trial Tactics