Welcome Guest

why wouldn’t you? (nm)

Posted on: December 7, 2019 at 09:42:29 CT

pickle MU

Posts:

267340

Member For:

26.44 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

(nm) means no message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

If china in response to US trade sanctions, bombed Hawaii - hokie VT - 12/7 09:23:36

Did you expect a truthful response? - jonesin - 12/7 09:37:46

why wouldn’t you? (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/7 09:42:29

I have found that most "progressives" either lie, or are too - jonesin - 12/7 09:45:15

So are you confused or stupid? - pickle MU

- 12/7 09:47:35

How do you and your friends define - jonesin - 12/7 09:52:27

try paying attention (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 12/7 09:45:54

ok - jonesin - 12/7 09:47:12

lol hokie™ (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 12/7 09:36:42

Anyone who thinks economic sanctions justify a military - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 12/7 09:28:48

When was that argued, Captain Strawman? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 09:39:09

RE: When was that argued, Captain Strawman? (nm) - Spanky KU - 12/7 09:54:41

lol, no (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 10:28:36

No (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/7 10:06:05

No one has ever argued that (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/7 09:30:37

You did - Spanky KU - 12/7 09:54:28

No. I have never said it was justified (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/7 10:05:39

You said “Japan retaliated.” - Spanky KU - 12/7 10:12:08

No it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/7 11:16:12

no, it's a statement of fact, not an endorsement of - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 10:56:01

Googlemeister thinks provoked = justified (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 12/7 10:11:15

he's going to dig in on it now. the search engines are - 90Tiger STL - 12/7 10:56:30

lol yup - SwampTiger MU - 12/7 11:22:14

Who's taken that position? (nm) - ummmm MU - 12/7 09:30:03

I wouldn't side with the Chinese govt/military and I - ummmm MU - 12/7 09:26:57

Also, I don't side with economic sanctions in any instance.(nm) - ummmm MU - 12/7 09:29:38

lol hokie. you’ve been running from questions for 4 years - pickle MU

- 12/7 09:26:43