Welcome Guest

the decision was made when the bowl ban was

Posted on: December 2, 2019 at 22:04:55 CT
KCT-BoneTiger MU
Member For:
9.93 yrs
M.O.B. Votes:
announced. If Barry was going bowling, he had the potential to finish with 7 wins and a bowl victory at Mizzou. More of the fanbase would have been on the fence.

The bowl ban gave him Sterk the opportunity to cut it off clean, without blowback from the current players waiting to play their bowl game without their coach.

That could have been a PR nightmare. You had to wait until they were done playing for the season.

And you can't wait until after the bowl game to fire, you'll miss out.

The bowl ban was the nail in the coffin for Barry, and he had nothing to do with the ban.

As soon as the ban was announced, contact was made to interested parties.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.




the decision was made when the bowl ban was - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 12/2 22:04:55
     The defense of a mediocre coach is astounding. - tigerman81 MU - 12/2 22:50:35
          yes, he did. Just saying, the scenario would be different - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 12/2 22:17:56
               Becasue aside from a felony, there was no circumstance that - alwaysright MU - 12/3 05:19:21
               I hadn't thought about it in the way you presented it but - MKrip MU - 12/2 22:36:02
     Ok - coolbean MU - 12/2 22:10:12
     RE: the decision was made when the bowl ban was - MOCO SON MU - 12/2 22:09:23
          Yes, who cares. Do your job at 50%, walk the bread line - tigerman81 MU - 12/2 22:53:35
          Likeability - missouri1972 MU - 12/2 22:22:20
               I couldn't disagree more with BenFred and that sickening - RayKinsella1922 MU - 12/2 22:26:48
                    Couldn't disagree with you more. Remember the - Ohtiger MU - 12/3 07:25:03
               SEG north? (nm) - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 12/2 22:23:37

©2020 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard