 |
|
the decision was made when the bowl ban was
Posted on: December 2, 2019 at 22:04:55 CT
KCT-BoneTiger MU
Posts:
28066
Member For:
13.65 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
announced. If Barry was going bowling, he had the potential to finish with 7 wins and a bowl victory at Mizzou. More of the fanbase would have been on the fence.
The bowl ban gave him Sterk the opportunity to cut it off clean, without blowback from the current players waiting to play their bowl game without their coach.
That could have been a PR nightmare. You had to wait until they were done playing for the season.
And you can't wait until after the bowl game to fire, you'll miss out.
The bowl ban was the nail in the coffin for Barry, and he had nothing to do with the ban.
As soon as the ban was announced, contact was made to interested parties.
The bowl ban gave him Sterk the opportunity to cut it off clean, without blowback from the current players waiting to play their bowl game without their coach.
That could have been a PR nightmare. You had to wait until they were done playing for the season.
And you can't wait until after the bowl game to fire, you'll miss out.
The bowl ban was the nail in the coffin for Barry, and he had nothing to do with the ban.
As soon as the ban was announced, contact was made to interested parties.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
the decision was made when the bowl ban was - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 12/2 22:04:55