 |
|
Yep
Posted on: December 2, 2019 at 15:46:28 CT
Ace UNC
Posts:
28905
Member For:
6.02 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1201537332509396998
1. For impeachment and removal you don’t need a smoking gun, just evidence that proves the point, directly, circumstantially or otherwise.
2. And you don’t need a quid pro quo—just abuse of power.
3. That said, there’s plenty of smoking-gun evidence here of quid pro quo.
https://twitter.com/theplumlinegs/status/1201502359223820288
1) Sondland *actually did* directly tell a top Ukrainian official that military aid was conditioned, and did this after taking direction from Trump for months.
2) Many officials testified meeting was conditioned.
*Those are* smoking guns. The *call itself* is a smoking gun.
1. For impeachment and removal you don’t need a smoking gun, just evidence that proves the point, directly, circumstantially or otherwise.
2. And you don’t need a quid pro quo—just abuse of power.
3. That said, there’s plenty of smoking-gun evidence here of quid pro quo.
https://twitter.com/theplumlinegs/status/1201502359223820288
1) Sondland *actually did* directly tell a top Ukrainian official that military aid was conditioned, and did this after taking direction from Trump for months.
2) Many officials testified meeting was conditioned.
*Those are* smoking guns. The *call itself* is a smoking gun.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Yep - Ace AU - 12/2 15:46:28